UCSF home page UCSF home page About UCSF Search UCSF UCSF Medical Center
UCSF navigation bar
Skip navigation

Document Research and Commentary

Document Research and Commentary

 

Agam G, Argamon S, Frieder O, Grossman D, Lewis D. Complex document information processing: Prototype, test collection, and evaluation.  Proceedings of SPIE International Society of Optical Engineering and The Society for Imaging Science and Technology Conference on Electronic Imaging. San Jose, CA; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.662918

Aguinaga Bialous S, Peeters S. A brief overview of the tobacco industry in the last 20 years. Tobacco Control 2012 Mar;21(2):92-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050395.

Anderson SJ. Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii20-ii28. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii20.abstract.

Anderson SJ. Menthol cigarettes and smoking cessation behaviour: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii49-ii56. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii49.abstract.

Anderson SJ, McCandless PM, Klausner K, Taketa R, Yerger VB. Tobacco documents research methodology. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii8-ii11. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii8.abstract.

Anonymous. How to access tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 2002;11(Supplement 1):i39. 

Anonymous. Big mouth. New Internationalist. 2004(369):16-17.

Balbach E, Gasior R, Barbeau E. Tobacco industry documents: Comparing the Minnesota depository and internet access. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:68-72.

Balbach E, Barbeau E. Beyond quagmires: The evolving quality of documents research. Tobacco Control. 2005;14:361-62.

Bero L. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annual Review of Public Health. 2003;24:267-88.

Bond L, Daube M, Chikritzhs T. Access to Confidential Alcohol Industry Documents: From 'Big Tobacco' to 'Big Booze'? Australasian Medical Journal 2009 04/03;1(3). http://www.amj.net.au/index.php?journal=AMJ&page=article&op=view&path[]=43

Brandt AM. Inventing Conflicts of Interest: A History of Tobacco Industry Tactics. American Journal of Public Health 2011 November 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300292

Brown CG. Rating tobacco industry documents for corporate deception and public fraud: a corpus linguistic assessment of intent. University of Georgia: University of Georgia; 2006. Available at: http://dbs.galib.uga.edu/cgi-bin/ultimate.cgi?dbs=getd&userid=galileo&serverno=8&instcode=publ&_cc=1

Brown C, Rubin D. Causal markers in tobacco industry documents: The pragmatics of responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics. 2005;37:799-811.

Brown C, Rubin D. Being frank: Ideology, construction and intertexuality in the tobacco industry’s "A frank statement." Texas Linguistic Forum. 2005;48:61-71.

Carter S. Tobacco document research reporting. Tobacco Control. 2005;14:368-376.

Chapman S. The stench of tobacco industry dirty linen. (editorial.). Tobacco Control. 2000;9:261-262.

Chapman S. Regulating the global vector for lung cancer. Lancet. 2006;367(9512):706-708. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68078-1

Chapman S. Health and philanthropy - the tobacco connection. Lancet 2010 Aug . Epub before print.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61036-7.

Collin J, Lee K, Gilmore A. Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: An invaluable global resource needs radically improved access. Lancet. 2004;363:1746-1747.

Concar D. The smoking gun. New Scientist. 1998;160:30-31.  

Cruz TB. Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic IV. The vector: Tobacco industry data sources and recommendations for research and evaluation. Preventive Medicine 2009 Jan;48(1, Suppl):S24-S34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.002.

Cullen D, Wayne G, Connolly G, Koh H. A guide to deciphering the internal codes used by the tobacco industry: Harvard School of Public Health Division of Public Health Practice Tobacco Research Program; 2005. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/resources/harvard_monograph.pdf

Cummings K, Pollay R. Exposing mr  butts’ tricks of the trade. Tobacco Control. 2002;11(Supplement 1):i1-4.

Daube M, Stafford J, Bond L. No need for nanny. Tobacco Control 2008 Dec;17(6):426-427.  Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.027763.

Diethelm P, Rielle J-C, McKee M. Links with the tobacco industry… authors’ reply to Ragnar Rylander. Lancet. 2005;365:211-212.

Dubois G. Le rideau de fumée. Paris: Le Seuil; 2003.  

Dyer C. Secret smoking documents finally to go on the web. BMJ. 2004;328:1335.

Friedman L, Daynard R. Scottish court dismisses a historic smoker's suit. Tobacco Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e4.

Gilmore AB. Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: an analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials. Tobacco Control 2012 Mar;21(2):119-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050397

Glantz S, Barnes D, Bero L, Hanauer P, Slade J. Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry: The brown and williamson documents. JAMA. 1995;274:219-224.

Glantz S. The truth about big tobacco in its own words. BMJ. 2000;321:313-314.

Glantz S, Slade J, Bero L, Hanauer P, Barnes D. The cigarette papers. Berkeley,: University of California Press; 1996. http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft8489p25j&brand=ucpress

Godlee F. WHO faces up to its tobacco links. BMJ. 2000;321:314-315.

Grimm D. Is tobacco research turning over a new leaf? Science. 2005;307:36-37.

Gutstein D. Murdoch's Ties to Big Tobacco. July 26 2011. rabble.ca. http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/donald-gutstein/2011/07/murdoch%E2%80%99s-ties-big-tobacco.

Hebert R. What's new in nicotine & tobacco research?  Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2006;8(4):481-486.   

Henningfield J, Santora P, Stillman F. Exploitation by design: Could tobacco industry documents guide more effective smoking prevention and cessation in women? Addiction. 2005;100:735-736.

Hiilamo H, Hirschhorn N. Tobacco industry documents from outside sources: New perspectives on industry strategies on local levels. Central European Journal of Public Health. 2006;14(4):175-179.

Hirschhorn N. Tobacco industry documents – secrets revealed. Global Health & Environment Monitor. 2000;8:7.

Hu B, Rakthanmanon T, Campana BL, Mueen A, Keogh E. Establishing the provenance of historical manuscripts with a novel distance measure. Pattern Analysis and Applications 2013 04/21:1-19.

Hurt RD, Ebbert JO, Muggli ME, Lockhart NJ, Robertson C. Open Doorway to Truth: Legacy of the Minnesota Tobacco Trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 May 2009;84(5):446-456. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/84/5/446.abstract

Jamrozik K. Barbarians inside the gate: How the tobacco industry penetrated the world health organization. (book review of “tobacco company strategies to undermine tobacco control activities at the world health organization.” Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000). International Journal of Epidemiology. 2001:633-634.

Jazbinsek D. Forschen schadet ihrer gesundheit [Peter Atteslander: Research harms your health]. Weltwoche (Zurich). 2005(47). http://www.weltwoche.ch/ausgaben/2005-47/artikel-2005-47-forschen-schadet.html

Klausner K. Menthol cigarettes and smoking initiation: a tobacco industry perspective. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii12-ii19. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii12.abstract.

Kretzchmar W, Jr, Darwin C, Brown C, Rubin D, Biber D. Looking for the smoking gun: Principled sampling in creating the tobacco industry documents corpus. Journal of English Linguistics. 2004;31:31-47.

Lambe M, Hallhagen E, Boethius G. [the cynical game of the tobacco industry: Many years efforts to deny or cover-up the negative effects of tobacco are revealed by the forced publication of internal documents]. [article in Swedish]. Lakartidningen. 2002;99:2756-62.

Lee K, Gilmore A, Collin J. Looking inside the tobacco industry: Revealing insights from the Guildford depository. Addiction. 2004;99:394-397.

Lee K. Peering through the smokescreen. New Scientist. 2004(2478):42-45.

Le Gresley E, Muggli M, Hurt R. Playing hide-and-seek with the tobacco industry. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2005;7:27-40.

Lee YO, Glantz SA. Menthol: putting the pieces together. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii1-ii7. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii1.abstract.

Liberman J. The shredding of BAT's defence:  Mccabe v British American Tobacco Australia. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:271-274.

Mackay J. The tobacco industry in Asia: Revelations in the corporate documents. Tobacco Control. 2004;13(Supplement 2):ii1-3.

Malone R, Balbach E. Tobacco industry documents: Treasure trove or quagmire? Tobacco Control. 2000;9:334-338.

Malone R. Tobacco industry documents: Comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access. Tobacco Control. 2002;11:285.

Malone R, Bero L. Chasing the dollar: Why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003;57:546-548.

Malone R. Telling the truth about big tobacco. Journal of Addiction Nursing. 2004;15:107-109.

Malone R. Nursing's involvement in tobacco control: Historical perspective and vision for the future. Nursing Research. 2006;55(4 Suppl 1):S51-S57.

McKee M. Competing interests: The importance of transparency. European Journal of Public Health. 2003;13:193-194.

Michel M, Bero L, Bright T. Creating a text data-mining application for use in public health informatics.  Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004, IEMBS '04, 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE; 2004 1-5 Sept; 2004. p. 3214-16.

Morabia A. The controversial controversy of a passionate controversialist. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2002;55:1207-1213.

Muggli M, LeGresley E, Hurt R. Big tobacco is watching: British American Tobacco’s surveillance and information concealment at the Guildford depository. Lancet. 2004;363:1812-1819.

Obafemi-Ajayi T, Agam G, Xie B. Ensemble methods with simple features for document zone classification. SPIE Proceedings 2012 January 22;8297:829706-829706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.912103.

Parascandola M. Skepticism, statistical methods, and the cigarette.  A historical analysis of a methodological debate. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2004;47:244-261.

Proctor R. Should medical historians be working for the tobacco industry? Lancet. 2004;363:1174-1175.

Proctor RN. The history of the discovery of the cigarette-lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tobacco Control 2012 Mar;21(2):87-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050338.

Ravnitzky M, Weigum J. Filtered or unfiltered information: Choices in how to make the Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository records more accessible to the public. William Mitchell Law Review. 1999;25:715-740.

Salgado MV, Glantz SA. Direct disease-inducing effects of menthol through the eyes of tobacco companies. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii44-ii48. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii44.abstract.

Smith M. Tobacco Papers Expose Foul Scents Across Industries: UCSF’s Legacy Tobacco Documents Library demonstrates how the tobacco industry pioneered modern techniques for manipulating politics, scientific research and public opinion. 2007; Available at: http://www.miller-mccune.com/legal-affairs/tobacco-papers-expose-foul-scents-across-industries-4783/. Accessed February, 2010.

Tannenbaum D, Weissman R. Multinational Monitor: Special Issue - The Tobacco Papers. 1998 Jul-Aug. http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm1998/98july-aug/toc.html

Todd J, Rennie D, McAfee R, Bristow L, Painter J, Reardon T, et al. The Brown and Williamson documents: Where do we go from here? JAMA. 1995;274:256-258.

Walburn R. The role of the once-confidential industry documents. William Mitchell Law Review. 1999;25:431-438.

Walker D, Ringger E, Seppi K. Evaluating supervised topic models in the presence of OCR errors. SPIE Proceedings 2013 February 4;8658, Document Recognition and Retrieval:865812-865812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2008345.

Yerger VB. Menthol's potential effects on nicotine dependence: a tobacco industry perspective. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii29-ii36. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii29.abstract.

Yerger VB, McCandless PM. Menthol sensory qualities and smoking topography: a review of tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control 2011 May 01;20(Suppl 2):ii37-ii43. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_2/ii37.abstract

[Back to Top]