MEMORANDUM TO: D. Bishop cc D.S. Watterton FRONI- Graham Burgess DATE: 16 March. 1995 SUBJECT: 1995 KEY AREA PAPERS At the 15th March BMB meeting, the Board agreed -he Following with regard to your draft 1995 Key Area Paper on Indirect Taxation ofTcbacco Producs~- 1. The paper needs to make it clear that tobacco taxation is primarily the responsibility of the operating company and 7arTicularly of the GMNum'Cer One (rather than BATCo HO). Could you please find an approprare place to make this point (e.g. section D. 1) A Paee Section C2: Please amend the phrase appropriate to the B. T brand mix...'(Iine two). to'-.. appropriate to the cu7ent and future brand mix.. 3 Paze 2. Section C6- Please amend the phrase' but act with ...'(line one) to ' .- but act (where appropriate) with ...' 4. Page 3 Section D 1: The Board ernphasised -.he importance of circulating to Operating Companies the case srudies/lobbyira arguments referred to in this section. 5. Section 3 Page 7 (fifth inset oaraaraDh) Please split the opening sentence of this paragraph into two sentences i.e. 'Hl,-,h tax3tion will ince-ricivise evasion. It is essential to ..' 6 Section 3. Paae 8 (first substantive caratzrach', This paragraph current!-, reads - 'Although it can sometimes happen. 'It 3 most unlikely that an Operating Company will be in a position. where'l elects. to absorb a part or all of an increase in excise taxation'. Could you please re-write this paragraph to convey that the BATCo pol cy Is that companies should not absorb such excise :ncreases unless there are very compe;ling reasons so to do. 7. Section 3 Paee 8 (second substantive oaraeraoh re VAT)~ There wassorne concern as to whether the imposition of VAT does give manufacturers a degree ofcontrol over retail prices. Could you please review this point. Ifyou still believe it is correct could you propose some re-vording (even if it is onlv' gives manufacturers a greater degree of contrcl BATCo document for Province of BritiSh Columbia 23 April 1999 C) 11 -, C-1 C:) L14 8. Section 4 re Excise Collection: The last part ofEhe first paragraph (page 9) refers to getting governments to carry the risk ofbad debts. Whilst the Board would like to see such a situation, it was felt that it is highly unrealistic to expect this to happen. Could you please review this e.g. are you referring to a very particular situation, such as the bad debts of a (quasi) official body. 9. Confidentialirw Does your Key Area Paper really need to be classified as 'Secret"? This is not the case with the other Key Area Papers. which are 'Restricted'. ('Secrei'means that the recipient cannot show it to anyone else without your explicit prior approval, whereas Restricted' means that whilst the paper is confidential the recipient can use his/her discretion as to whether or noE to show it to other people). C3 uld you please 1e! me have an amended version ofthe Key.-Vea Pape- Friday Z4 th March. Thanks C; rll~ CY, CD BATCo document for Province of BritiSh Columbia 23 April 1999