I- _TL) C_ 'J LIW M Imperial Tobacco Limited U 381C SI-Anioire Stree Monirdal. Carpacz HAC 1~i! (514)932-6161 Jean-Louis MerC;er Chatrman 9" Chief Executive 01f1ccer Novwabar 15, 1991 BY F&X1 011-44-71-627-5570 Mr. Donald Trelford Editor The Observer Chelsea Bridge House Queenstown Road, London SWS 4NN Dear Mr. Troltord: We have road the article which appeared on the front page of your November 10 issue suggesting that Imperial Tobacco Ltd. in Canada used its advertising to lure people as young as 12 years old into imaking. The headline is wrong and grossly misleading as is much of your article. Imperial Tobacco did not and does not advertise to non-smokers or to any one below the legal age to buy cigarettes. The documents wore not, an you suggested ' "hiddanw. The ago groupings, as presented in the article, misreprasent the document I a origin and purpose. Here are the facts as they war* presented, in unchallenged fashion, during a y r I n txial in Montreal which, a - 0 Yn a Quebec Superior court the article fails to mantion, re:u1ted judgment that the Canadian ban of tobacco advertising is unjustifiable in a free and democratic society. (The judgment is be nq appealed by the Canadian govox, ant to the Quebec Court of 10 Appeal, not the Quebec governmant to the Supreme Court as you say.) The judgment nowhere found anything blameworthy in either the advertising or the advertising strategies of imperial Tobacco. ,Tudge Chabot in his ruling hold that the Government had not shown that tobacco advertising causes people to smoks and ruled that the Tobacco Products Control Act banning such advertising is an unconstitutional restriction of fro* speech under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ... 21 "N.) BAT Industries document for Legal Services : Health Canada 20 October 1999 - 2 - Your article implies, through its presantation of our documents which show "target group 12 to 17", that this is the age of the brand marketing target of some of our brands. That implication is false. our marketing plan of that year (1980) shows that the Player's brand target group was from the minimum legal age for the purchase of cigarettes under Canadian federal law to ago thirty. The documants you presented are not marketing strategies but extracts of media planning documents. The difference in important, as was explained to the court and as I am sure you well understand. The Print Measurement Bureau is an organization that supplies standardized information on readership of magazines to any ma-rkater wishing to purchasis such information. Imperial Tobacco is one of many organizations that does so. The readership of different publications was presented in acme six ago groups by the Print Measurement Bureau, from the youngest (12-17) to the oldest (65-1-). The photo in your article, for whatever purpose, eliminated reference to the groups other than the youngest. rux-thar, this information vas used prima ily to determine jr&au&Z3cv of placement of advertisements. Among the most important determinants used by Imperial Tobacco in the selection of publications were (i) that the publication accepts tobacco advertising (obviously) and, if it does, (ii) that Its editorial orayoneral contant not be oriented towards audiences younger than th r late teens, Nearly all of these facts were given to your journalist by our counsel. We would be pleased to continue to help your staff to more accurately report this issue. I thank you for this opportunit of clarifying the fact and would be grateful if you could &bIYah this letter to keep the facts straight for your readers. 0 Yours truly, J-L Mercier (Signed) J-LM 1 Pt Original to fol1cw by post BAT Industries document for Legal Services: Health Canada 20 October 1999