__ 3~ SECRET Note to II C~ Brown, Esq~ Greendot Whirst I am impressed at the speed at which Greendot is progressing, I have serious concerns for the validity of pursuing the current route based on incorporation of a nicotine salt into tobacco sheet, As you well know, arguments rage over whether or not the Reynolds' product will be classified as a cigarette and one of the important issues is whether or not nicotine occurs "naturally" within the tobacco land is not added by some fortification means)~ I have asked Sharon Bcyse to clarify the validity of incorporating nicotine or its derivatives by the methods you are pursuing for those countries where the product is likely to be of interest. Until we have a really clear signal that we can proceed by the current route, I feel it is imperative:::at we keep a very open mind in selecting technical options to achieve the Greendot objective~ I am enclosing a rough draft of a note which Bob Johnson produced on his work with tobacco substitutes which was an important focus of his activities 18 months or so ago, You will see some close similarities to the ar!Droach you ale developing with Greendot currently, It should be stressed, however, that in the ease of 8&W's work, the initiative was not to create a commercial product but to develop means of understanding the sensory characteristics of dmake more prcroundlyl In the current approach to Airbus I saw no reference to nicotine foxtiEifation. Indeed, in order to increase nicotine delivery from tobacco, BhW are looking at inclusion of DA? or, more interestingly, at the use of Y1, the high nicotine flue cured varie:yl r would appreciate your comments on ::?is very important issue, G1~(1V· R~t. Heard clc~ Or, R~ Binns ALRIDET 22Ad July 1988 C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111