__·_ NQTE'TO MR P CWU(E SPC1OIJMH 111~Ma~eh1992 CANADA From the earlier papers wbieh I sent to you, you will know that the No~ Smokers Rights Association hew obtained two cpipns of counsel to the effect that the government is he (D inLte Ihet Bill CSlproposak;, nohvithslanding the decision of MrJust~e Chabot Not that I Link that they are pa&ub~ interesting, but I do enclose a #Ipy of the hvo opinions which Roger Acknan has very kindly provided. SPC~FEN Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 C )1 I-I -I- ·--· SENT mllYPERIK TW~eO ~O ; s-n·~ : 1~1~ ; SECRE~!U. 0~2n~~~l '' r (~Yy ~lunli 9 1_ ~~Pw ~~·~ 110~ ~I ba + I Ulo ~~~ ~w~n PII, s(L0: I~ ~~~q? bc~nb~f~l~l Yly~u l~ln 8~14~02~311 ~ GrBad ~n~hoad L~a L~lrt Dinbor L·g,t~ Y~ khl· ~ I1P f~l ~t ~e Sd~e 1 rlCr~: TOlOna, Qtdo kRr~ ~IJy ~ca ~~Y YY It ~~I·~()1~ YI~ ~~lr uPdyt~LTpbrrrpp~ndud1Col~ br hn dd ~ $ 11~ r b ~(~ PlomublY~ II ~t ~ b ~ Covnn~ ~ q,4 )·rLI~~*(~~Y,yW*~ 19W, 1E q ~'~I I~ ~ac L~L~aC,, y,, pl!d P1~ (bcpl~ I~,~? eri ea h pi ~ nat I~·t ~ ~ e~e Supttlor QII Y~ ~1 bll~' had~ el~ M L ~c13 b IPA ~ le Od~r~ Ml~at ~L13l~l~b~l~(C~ g, &r~~?, ~~t Yloa ~ eunnl]l ·(e ~, ~ 1~ Cap~ddy~6e ~I~~~CbC ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni ~IT BPIU~ERIAb TDBACCO LTD I J·ll·0a i I:3aAw I SEGREBRIII· 011222012210 3 can~ae~cfl~~''' brief, my opinion i thlt there is no k~a Impcdlmst to h in Caundl proretdlng to bring farwltd dp poporrd Bt iowa court fubgmcn~ Is suspended pmdlng Ippe~ md ~ Art therefore nnulu In full for~ end ellea In my event e of I plovindll lupsl court is not binding In other even when the ddlty of n fcded etstute is in Iplrtloh a' I Ib upon IO b tObllKI tompmlu to mi M Intulocutory inludaian a~l~dnlng miortlmm~ of the Ad und nguktloa Inulda p~nding Erul d~~mninldon of the ~ppli, but my opWwn ~ that ruch an ~njunedon would not be grented. Ihe public interest In pol~nlllly F~wn~ng ch, dtL dr g~t m~ny Cmldiua aulwlig~J "Y eYpc~~a md lor! ptoAa dut the Mb~eM campmla might lulfer in complying ~th the Irl end regulstions Lawnde, Morcowq even If 1 All ww u]tlmldy found to be unu~httitutl~md by Ut Suprunr Court of Cuudl, I Im of ths dnr dut no eh~m in dlmsgcl would 11I ~gdnt the Crown or the Minister of N~dth for nuklng ~~uiatlolu under the Ad which m subsequently found to be of no rorre~o~dtcn fhe Tp~p~W PrP~ue~ bnlrd Art wu plsed by Puliamcnl end ume Clo /01~ in 1988, Arang otha Llng~ UIo A~t pl~cn dit~rm on ~ob~eo plodud ,dvor9sing ~nd rmndlt# h~lth win;ingr snd la~e conujitumt lists on dr l~n tob~ac produdpaclug# Subxdionlllt) prov(d~ thst.the GoYernor in C6undl rmy rmke IPpUILL10111: prcs~bfnk In rt~peet of eny lob~eco product, the content, position, configuration, sine end promlnenec of die mc~~lger end list of ioxlc eorsti~uei~tl relmed to In puegreph 9(1)W; C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT Br:BPWIII TOBICCO ITO ; J·18·sl ; 8:36111 ; SE~RETIRIL· ~ 8111220122~11 i It l,i I I~~Yuk~nj C~np~Fod~i'l' / paragraph 9(11(1) of the Ad reins to information to he printed on /etall lob,cro Product PlekapPa, Pursuant to ~ubrMiMI ilU), ng~ll~cP4 luve bnn pus~ xttlng out the rmndltwy wMtnsl md mes~ag# referred to In puagnph 9d)w: (S~O.R 1J3111b Almot imncdltely attn the Ad rame into fog two major tobiero rompiullos, RJR·M~edcndd Int, and Imperial Tebatoo ltd., aPan~nced procct~np boL In the QvRke Superior Court end In the nid M~t~lon of the kdenl Court ehallenging the #Mdllon~ty of · lho)4rh L ftdenl Court action wu Id]PumJ pmding deleimlnlclan of the procerdlng in Ulr Qutboe Supular Court On ]uly ~, 1991, Mr;juln laln·lude ChJol released I decision In dach he found that the Act wa ultra Pirrs parliament, as well as conbny td NbsKdon i(bl of the Ch~l~ Ind CODllquentiy of no Lm or eHKt C~utp~b hDwwn, nlused to grant the lob~Eeo mmpmin' medon in provlJPnd exceutlon of his Judgment notwlthlLdlng appeal, writl;lg: eonsldsing that this is a eoplpla eonstitutionai nutta whleh goes beyond the ~hpb ndresof mt belated violation of a ateranteed right and that a are dealing with a dsetaratlon that an entln etatuta if inoperative, the Court Is of the opinion not to grant the provisional execution notwl~hnding appeal, Indireaty requested in the conCiusions of the applieMtsl rnotlons, ~ ~jL ~ rault the #rmlicn of dK iudgmtnt b nupndcd pPoding understand that th.e proposed new regulations under 11([)d the Ad, rtqurr]ng mon prominent health wam(ngt mt tPplera ~dud patl(aitea, have bem drafted and prepned for impkp~mlttioh I tlre'uhd~nbnd that the qu~ction hi now ueen ~ht~f fuhnaullti~u NI and ought to to promulglted in vlew d Chabot j, C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ·_f__· _· shNl Br:IIPERIL IOBACeO LTp 1 3·16·92 ; 1131W ; SECRETARIIL· 0112220122;9 5 ii Ihn~nCnmpb~Gdd~ ''' AF~YSIS ; wIdlo I tcpr~ly rah~n Rwn Ecpa$ ~ny opWon on ~ pollqd qu~~n wh,Ln Ut Ccvunol In Cau~dl lould pro#td w]l L proposld rq4kti0lu, my opinion ii ~It from 1 Igtl pvspKiioe, no impedlmene what~a~vw ex~u preventing Implemal. 'dPn of thue ngYldJDN, 2daher, my view b bu uny ~cmpt to restrain promub~tlon or enforcement or the prepaKd r~gu~tlw would fill, as would my ~rHon for dlmngn resulting from a lub~cquent finding thu the Ad, I"d therefore the regulations, are unconstitutional, Iwlll he ~dd~eufng four dinlnet IssueJ ~na;y~yr~ ~ln~l wiu eneiyu It 1q11 effect of Mr, fatln Ch,bof'r gurpcnded dcC1~Iltlon ngrding tbm con~tltution~llty of the Act. SKwldly, lwfn eonddu the effect of his ]udgmmt under the doa6nr dsfir~ d~E~L, Thirdly, I: will Inmlnl the quotlon whnhn in in~cdm or inlaioalng InJIDlaion might be obhlad Icltr~g my I~BP eXeQtlVL actions Pursuant to the impugned Ad or loguLtionl thUe~UlldC ~y,l ~1l Eonddu thr quadon wh(thcr a dw f6' duruget Igdvt the fedenl government, in relation to the hnp]cmcnt~tig d lh( plopowd ngulltlonq could rumrd I $ dedrtan olChubbll, were uldnullly upheld 1· /~h~Ef~dPtlhrSu~ i fhr drdsion ob Ch~ba~t ddutd the Ir~ unrolu8$lonu on bwhp~la and diuls~on of Powers groundo, Howwer, the Attorney f"'l~ " C~nad~hu In~P~b~d an ~peal bd~ore Ut Quebre Court of whleh is jehedultd for heufng in 1991 nhr Qa of the Ipplll is to euspuld the cxcatlon of the Supalor Court Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 -~--. sEHT Q91PEly II#)ITD : ~r~I ; PII I LPITIII· n~nnnl I i bb~ htlplld ald~ 197 of the OP oj 01 Crdl~ 1~~1 h ~ ~I pa~bnl b.l· L dad, In ~d ~$ broulhl rUrPeedr Ud aldon ol~~rt A" ~ ~P~g led lnd ~,*~ c 8rt ProVlllorlel ·IdC 01 Y ]udlment ~$,~ ~~ "gl·~ UI ~,,(, d the ludgmcnt ~ ~~ I otoyd ad dr r h~l Y4·~g~~Lpo~Mdi~ ~ %r I fudgmortt h ~gd pcldbl ~a 1~1~ b, if,,,, or order, aP JPdC·1 br no ~~L~ 1~1 eilealnd ~ q oort whieh wue found bY be trie] court to he eld or mn~uy to la Plj OILp( pd4 6~r·d Lblq,~~~l aC #1 aa~ ab 'h~ (1991), 5 M (3d) rf L pd, II relult b Lr me Aa I.~, i" Y force end h pmdlnl ]udgment of the $(~( Coa of ~ppr~t Hq opWon, therefore, Ls~C no I~ ~~I to Ue y~l ly~ 1 'dr ~ enforce thl P"Yr of the Ad, or b b( eovemw i Counol ~ Pk ~l·I1Ddl me M~ 2 h my dq overt Lint It L~ llrI· of Y lueHoo Q~ ·~,~ dddoq the Ldd Court ed me Ca of O&' pl~g wou]l be ~~$ I m~b cyl ~ bY ~ m~8r~a '1~1 tbe IUI~ILJ l~y or ~lu, The : ~'·~'IC~~sby·~.ll~p 1 1 jhr~h~LLrl~a~~l~~b~QaJQ~,~8~1 !Dd~~l~ry F~ met orrmtlen ehrl he ~~ r atta II·~ ql ~Q 11 IYI '" the llllel m the lopeo Old C ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni SEAT BY:ILIPERI~ TOBC~CCO LTD t 3·16·92 1 8:39Ml 1 SECREfARULI 0112220122;6 1 ,~, ~Faa~nCa~b~iCad~'"' ,1. provlbee~: Rrid p. Sigu~on (1979), 32 CB,R (N,S,) 110 1B~~S,C) pc HutchePnF fag he then war); R~ a, Bnmctl, [1980]1 W,~S, 339 (Altk CIW, fhuu, while the ]udsncnt of Chlbct), mly he majldutd of pauaiive VJul In proce~dlngt In obor IllpdM outs, do~s not have binding nltlouleffch In fret, it mPy not even be binding In LI plovlnp of PueboS whac t~N CMUI of Appc~ hu lug~~d 111 Lhl domlne ollbn d~i~ doa Mil kam Iput e~ Ihe lew of Brb~c: Brll~ur o, Low~jU, t19SI] at 193 (Que, eA,), / BI propodtlon la Mr, Ptia Ql~kOYI dedrlon is not Wndinp on courtS of ccKlrdlnate jurkdirtlPn b nr~lp UlultntPd by 1000 Involving 11 kded Compdtlon Tdbunl, In Alu C~u$nlne a Cnnnds Ulfanq Qnmll (1990), XI CP,6 (Jd)l (pue~ sC), Phllippon ~, of the QuEbeC Superior Court held that ee~hir;PDO~iSiON of II~ Compd(lion Ad, RS,C, 185, c CJ4 (u MMded) end of the tomprtilion fribmPI Ael, RS~C 1983, c. 19 (26 Supp,), were inroahont with the CLnrls end therefore of no k~ of dlKt Subjequently, In Cnah IDikrfo~ clln~~sllg~lbn 6~ RuPrrh) o, Nnhpsrput Cp,(l9dOl, 31 CP~R Ud)l(Ccmp, Trih3, two indges of the 'Idai Division of the Feds~l Ccurl lltlng n I pmel of the comb~li6on Tn~m,l, aFPnly d~dln~d to fanbw the ru]4 In dlu eot~iun Ini, end ~eched predrcly the oppol~ Eondudw~ regudlng the e6~1Yion~ll~ of the two eolnpetit]on Juu~El, In Nulff~wd, the Mrmor of Inv~atlkden e Rwlreh did not ~dJoum ~nlo~rlmmt pmc~dlgr lollodng Uc pu(ke SupPiol C~u~ d~ci~l~ md ukKd before 11 ebmpetidon Mbunl tt~t the'lrlmuwl wu not bwnd to Uo~ tbe Quebce deb~on, iSMlerlv. In Saulkam br n r~ma~~;~i.u htL~·~I~~M1\ ~r I -------y~ --~ -·nn~r~~l IlI·1 ~· ~~((I)IIIIVn IIIYYRI( \111111 JJ CP1 (Jd) 196 (Ee,T,D,). Iffd I1Pn1. s(, cpa w~l Im fnc I \ i ~'' --` "'~'·'r( l- -····* ~V*l V*V \I~~·nJl ~, nhrd to gnnt I Ihy of poccadlngt an e rmHer before the Trlbunel ~hlfh Ihy hd been n~~tFd in vlnu of the ~Suprrlo~ epurt'l dcdrlon holding the Mburul'l govurJrg invalid), McKlyj, n held notwltbrbnding that the puebce Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 _ ~_I~· I IENT II:IYPElj~L ~OBICeO LTD I J~1~2 ; PUI; t~E~I~ nunnnrl ~Ii ~'~~p C Q~l~k~ ~~ ~dt Innbd ~o~~ a~h~~by.y ~ e·I I ~~ "~~ e~, t dadd ~ ~ddd ~I LI Lo ~ ~ p·l p I ~ ton lor~ ~al~ L Y)t~ L~3 ~~ I Qo~g u c~r PI Olr HC~ C bl )c~ldd ,a ''''' ·~IJ hi ~ ~~I ~ bid ,k ~n ~ t ~ hyl I~al ~ ~ n~rt Br ~ judldd ~pl d ~t .~u~ ~Co~uU~ Irddon pendjy t~ ltd ~ d31~, ·d IQ ~y ~t ~t dtdrlp I ~ ~ ~dC ~ L ~~~LI ~I y L4. ae t~l, dl~ dr ~ *' "dl tl ,t d6 bl~ ~~jre co3x~ri~ ~ ILld be h Be P~t P4 pd~ dr po+d~ Ipde m·l lu ~~ (I b~ Old~dd ddB ci ~Ycl Y1~14 ~ II Y ~ at ~~10P1 ·p~ dy ~dpal pl~l btd L Qlbr ~Pb ·d ~I ~ Id~ F~dr bl p I~l~~dr 11 ac ~~ ~ ~Yt ~ ~ ~,t d d( Aa ~ C ~QI~IDI d ~ P~d 3d~ bl~ /eq ~nlon 8~1 Bg h, P~t ~I ~~~at ~ ~I ""b ld· pa·1~ ~ 441r b h ~1~ '~Y~s~nlu ~ ~la Yo comp~nice ~ ~,~I c ry 4 ~~ ~I ~ g~ bit ~ A~ ply ~ ~ ~La ~, ·~~ ~ ·m~it~ur ~ I ~EV~Wfl~lll'~)~l~rl~lsWy~ 0' ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni SENT BY:tYI[RI)IL TDBICCO ITO ; 3·11·s1 1 1:111 ; 5ENETARIL;· 0111110121:i I :I t 'i~.~n~ampb~UCo~~Pi'"' my such~further actions, More specifically, the tobacco companies ' migihl seek m Inlldoc~tgl h)unctlpn lo rc~aL my ur#utive IdDn purauant to the Ad and regulations, pending final Lpod6an of the cw~tl(udwd~ 4ue~tiorJ], In mt opi~ the court,woJd not pt luc~ m In]unc.don, nphrlthrlmdlng the conclusion. dLk jluB# oldot that the Arl is ulbP m'ro sud Ineorslstent with the Chsrtet. Since a motion for an Intorloeutorl injunction is the most lil:eiy mcuu by which the uJw;rmenl of the proposed ~cgu~tlwu might be c~ullehged, the issue therefore merits detailed ronddPdloh 33913 is ample precedent In Canadian law for the proparitlan that m inttrlohlwry Injunction may be granted to rerhaia exKub've IttiMls pursuant to 1 statute which is the subpd of I, pending constitutional challenge: pr Altomq Cmml ol Mnsltobp and Mrtropolitnn SteM (MTSI Itd (19331, 38 D.LR ~~ 321 (S~C~C)~ Toe test employed by the courts in such cases b bapd or; the t#t applied $ pdvlr tw motions for Inta~ocutPry Inplnionf, although;ertsln aspens me adapted to account for the fact that the public at large has an interest In the result. The Ihretpronged test was set Wt by BpeD ~, In M~ttppollt~n gora, at 3331, in the following terms The flnt test is a preliminary and tcnt~Ulre assessment of the merits 01 the wc,but then is more than o~e my to delaibe this first test The treditoawl way consists $ uldng whether the Udgmt who s~e~r the interlocut6ry infunctlon can ~ mike out a prints I~h case, The injvncdon will be refused unlrrr he an (atablieh I prime fecie wj ,,, The House Of lords has somewhat tel~wtd t~ first testlnAmahn Cylnomld 6~ w EUlieon Wd,, I k~b~undbndll MI lie a331nat the Cou#nat hi Council to rclbJn the nu#ns of nlul~loN: d$mllh, lu~ld~l I(1P(M Of ~nllJ1Ak AdlOn (tandon: Shmu dr Ser)s/ 10t011(1, dclnl Mml~ r H~d~aCArmo~y, 1193q oh ~bl, SilrJtsriy, am Court of Appul hu held that proNbltlPn does not he to control the aerciee of Ictlllllvl pawn possessed by theCovernmht Council or I MIU#I p, et~ s~ ~, sPnj FC 99~(E~,~ Thus, the tobacco to~~# w be limited to Ke~nl an injuntlon to restrain enforcement of the proposed afts they arepromulgated, Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 _·_·· ·_ I SENT BY:IPERIAL TOBaCeO LTD 1 3·11-82 ; 8:IZC~M ; SEGRETARIAI~ 01122201221110 'I I~ I' 1197Sj A,C 396, where it hold tLt I111 thit wu "KCssUy to meet this test wu to setis[y the Court that theme was I Iulaul question to be tried u oppMed to I. frivolous or vexetious ddm ,,, In my view ,,, the Amrtfroe Cyanamld 'suious question" lormuistion Is ndndont In 1 constitub'onalcase where, u indinted below In these reuonr, the publle interest Is Ukea Into corulderidon In the ballnee ot eonvcnlenee, ,,, The second test mnrLs In deddlng whether the 1Pdelnt who seolu the Interlooltorj Inlunrtlan would, unlPa the infunrtlPn is grutted, luffa ~mpalbl~ Lrm, that is hum not susceptible w difficult to he rompmsaled In dlmsges, some judges consider It the same time the situation of the other perty to the UHgltlPn ad isk themsdvu whether the grmtlng of the tnterloeulory InJundion would aure ImpuPe hum to this Othv pu~ U the meln ~ctlon hC Other judges hke the view t~at this last srpcb rather fwmr put of(hob~lannofxonvmllncr ~I~he third test, celled the balance of convenience ud which ought perhaps t6 he called more ePProPrfately the haluce of inconPcnknce, is a delerminetfPn of which of the two putles will 'UHcl the greeter hum h0o11 the gnnting ep lefi~ of ul inlerlooltwy fn]unrdon, pmding a decision I on the me~t~, j /Thg greet IMjority of luas involving modons for intdooltwy "Llpading di~alitlcn of co41lhido~ul ehlongcr uh pPlw to ur dUrminlllPn u to con~80ltlrmJ dldl~ "vcw~ UK Um( pdndblk;'ppeu to epply where e lower soa hu already ~uled~t~! . thC Inlpugned Icg~slatlon if unfonstltutlonal: SaufhPm inc, Eupra, In the SauBsm decision, McKeyj, dismissed the motion to restrain belon the Compctltlon trlbund notwllhltendlng e .ot the Quebee Superior Court etrlWng down the relepent McKeyj, found thlt the Pulhce decision, coupled with 1 lO"nldlng decision of the CMnpetlliMI Mbuntl merely Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SEn IYIIYPERIIL ~0&ICCO 1TD ; j·il-gZ ; IIa31: SEERSTblk 0111120122;111 !i~Gdb~Ca~~d~Co~irp') a~M ih~t Ba, wu i. uda bra a bl alld, h wu Iji Inc~imb~nt an the mooing puty to satisfy the lrnparabie harm and b~ce of convenience components of the test in a sirniiar vein is the deddon ad Tellelballm i bt Culj Tnllen o, Conode 1Mlnblcr ol ~iJh~l~r sad O(rens) (bII~, 6 ET~ 1 (ECtO,). Thae, the mo~lng partlos sought an ]ntalocutary ~iedon to restrain the respondents from taking executive action p~uafit to ulmah fuhlng rcguldoru which were eliegsd to be uftra olnj Pdlmml NptwllLUndlng that another judge of the MI1 Di~lon of the kdonl Court bad recently ruled, In 1 dedsion then under appeal, that vlrtuly identical regulations were ulln oirrJ, Teitelb~um~l refused to gnnt inter`loeutory relied, TMs c~nclwlan wu reached even though the regulations challenged were indiftinguth· able In a aicr xnw from the regulaticau dreldy held to he ulltn ainr. rdhlblum E fwnd that the prior ]udgmcnt establilhad a serious issue to be tried, but eondudd thet the brlence of converJsnec, nod tin public Inteml did not favour granting thllnjunction, Tnr facts giving rise to the Gulf Trollm can are also interesting In that the MMster of Flrhwla proceeded to peas the impugned nguiations in the fan of an CXi~dhp Fcdenl court ludgncn~ holding that other regulations, which were indlstingQh9le from a division of powers point of view, wort invalid, The Minister's position wu ultimately endorsed by the kdenl Court of Appeal, which overturned the then~ ~d~~~bnd~ M3 U di.t~ullloN w~lulm lin~ ~Rnlng to the Ipplicalon of Mrf~opo~Bml Slot~!#~ to the p~esbt case i must be conceded that if an· interlooltorj Injunction we~CI:EOupht today, the tobacco companies could establish that then is a ~qrqur rna lp a Mla fnll he! slrm Indllput~bll slven ~he of Bdbatj, However, my opinion is that the tobacco companies would be to succeed in establishing the second and third components of C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT BI:IYPIRIAI TOBACCO LTD 1 3·11·91 I 8:399J1 I SECRETAR~K~ 01122201221012 i~nC~oal~ad~~'"' the ~dropoLan Slom ~al, The H(Ond component nqulru the ~Ob~FCD rompmbl to dmmonrtn~l tLI the wfll litly cuffer hve to demonstrate thit eompli~nn with the d~l nod the hvn~ not eompenable In ddm~geL If the injunction b 1 In older to,llmcd mm Ih~ polt,, the Leed mmpll pmdwtd npllllk~u wo~d ~w ndalantia ~d Imcwa~ble laua lp! ~~m. B Inme unl~tly Ib~~ my lub~hndll k~la dd be c~ebl~hed honl m expuuc point of vllw, It Iwt 4 ~gud~ compUance with the propald ngul~lons - the Ecpene of plnSng Illg~ hull wU"l"g~ mly Involve I minor Inlt~ #pmre, but thenlbcl would not be of Ndl ~ rmenllude a to g~n tbe FFp~C~tll eer dt the court I in my view, the tobelrp romp3nie3 could find lenuCcs on inch I motlw In the polilon of atlcmptlng to c~hbllrh irrop~nbh hum by demonr~ntlng M11 Lo mole prominent hulth wunlngt 11 leld to u Incvll~bl~ ud ~ub~ll~ d~olu~ In sllq ud therefore Irofit~~ Surh 1 bluda would put the Jlcro romp~nlll In the uncofnfortlble poritlon o~ Lying to ~gue ttut health wuntng3 do phy II sub#anti~ role in daeulng the conuumptlon of tobacco prodbctl II I PIDPOdliOn th,.i W11 Isong]y denied by the ~M( LPmponls b~lon Ciubotj. From e paiul ed plomotionl point al okw, the tobacco rompmi~s would Ilhly be crtnmely unwilling to ~dvobtt ruch I po3!ljon, The fours In ~uch clsr hnve rl~o considmd the hun diet be sllu~ by Ihe govunrmnt, end public It ]uge, If 'NID'y InjYn(liY~ nlici wet, gnad, In my vltw, Ihi~ Sldrrr tot, the balmee a~ conenlencc, ~t is well· properly foa~ put of Ihe third component el the thet ullninetlon of the bll~nn of convenience In ruth j cuclllnpolvu mFII~Llll/dn not only of the fntcmt~ 61 the but Jlo ol the pUblk a Iqr lhe qpwrh h at out by ~t.ln IC(ropoLn Sfors, a 338·9, In the foUowlng (cmu: C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 I·re ~·I,~. - SENT BY:IYPERII1 TOBIee0 LTD 1 3·16·92 1 81151Y I SEeRETARIIL· 07122201121u13 Whether or not thy ate ultimately held to be constitutional, the laws which iitigants seek to suspend or from which they Kek to be exempted by wey of Inkrloollory injunctive relief have ken enacted by dem6~tl~ly elected legislatures and are gcncnlly pissed for the common good, for instance, the providing and financing of public services such as eduntionai services or of public utilities such as dccnidty, the protection of public hul$ natural resources and the environment, the repression of what is considered to be criminal ard~y, the controlling of economic acdvlty lueh·~ the contllPlng of inflldoh the regJlltlon of Ilbour ret~dons, etc It seem ~smrde that the grMting of . ht~locutory InJunctive relief in mast suspension cases and, up to a point, as will be seen later, in quite a lew exemption cases, is susceptible temporarily to frustrate the pursuit of the eoaunon good ,Whlle respect tot the Coiutitutlpn must remain puunount, the queJtion then arises whether it is egultlble end lust to deprive the public, Or important sectors thereof, ftamI protection md advantlges of impugned legislation, the invalidity of which Is merely uncertain, unless the public interest is taken into consideration in the balance of convenience and is given the weight it deserves, As could be expected, the eQU~ have gcnually answered this question In the nes~tlve~ in looldng It the bd~ner of convenience, Icy have found it necessary to rise above the interests of private Ilt(gel up to the level of the public interest, md, in ant Involving interlocutory inlunctions directed It slatutory authorities, they have eorn4 held it erroneous to deal with these authorities as if they have any interest distinct from that of the public to which the owp the duties imposed mt thorn by statute Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SEn Br:IYPERjlL ~OBICCD LTO ; 3·11·92 ; 11:16111 ; SECRETARIAL' 0112210112;111 I i~a~CamC11GaCqr"~ Edr,Jurtlco Beeh added at 3(g: 1~1 The public In~rolt nalaa)y cerriee gru(tr weight la hvour of compllp~e with EdlKng ]~8WltlMI In lurgm~h eues ~vh~n the Impulcd pro~t~lotu ore b~ald d ltenenl end nuch 4 to ~Hectlg~u~m~nyperronrC Other ~ourt~ hve C lecqhd ha the gublle Interest ought to rise Lbw, cmnomlr Lra whleh ney k dfpsd by ~prte Itrglnb. In AI1~Pnrj Cunrol of CPn~d~ o, Hinl VMa ermirr~ AssPriafion d Bn~U ColaBt 11985]1~C, A (Cd.), ouse whcr~e '" in)unction wu aght to m~in the Impkmahddn d quotas p~julnt to ~. I Ghing rrg~l~tiwl R,tte )I wrote It 795: when 1 public Ilollly h prcvmlod IrPm aaddng its lllblW1 PoWUI, it un k 114 In 1 osse ~ke the prwnt one, thlt the public htenst of which tha ~uthorlty 1g the guerdien, lufhn fnepuable hum; j I" hgir trallas Aao~iolion D, Allpnq Gonerei of toeodo flo~l 1 oxl~ ~s rr~D3, ~MUia Rdcnl Court w Involving ulmon Afhing nsu~tiPns, Coiliclj, d~xrlb~d the pPtcntll hum to mo puWe i Inlv~l in trmu whid uc opt ~dl the pmt cut et g(~5R fhe pldn~U~ ,ly 8ny will be uneble to fit ~o~ tu~n CLia orLh la I limited or longer pniod · of time; they hn "P IC8L] Rcour~e to recover monNtul dufilyc~ 1[ they ere to prevented ~Wllerep~ thlt propoeiticn lor'the purpa~ of thj~modon, Thisdoes not mem I"easJuur Igne wiPI it nw" n(er to those crmpla wlw" the ~movly p$ wau lp oaeXectltiye lltlDns PrntlUII ta ~E Impupd If~llbtlen C ca pm cucl' m thou where UKmavlry party lae~l~Lnon~l cumpllbn Irwn Uw Ol~hlc)ulb~edLtuB Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 :~Y' le·~' ·LCI · 0112220112;115 SEIT llr:IY7UII# TOB~ttO LiD ; 3-11.11 ; I:1II; SEUIETIIK1 :iiad~~a~Fo~'ll~ But I also have to look hat It the dan~ge which might be inflicted on the ~mon fifhlty rc~ou~t~ if an Injunction wat granted until trial, T~r ouldnnP by 1l, Shinna, is that the damage to the te~our~~u a whale could he eo~sldanbly ~uta ihun ~ny suffered by the plltffh memkn I acctpi Ulat cvldena Furtku, the~ an no grolmd~ ~wkllo4 tht loll to the texxlrcemuld be compensated for in money, or, oven so, that the plelndff association would be In a flnandel pJdlm to ply those damages *I In my vlew,che harm sul[ued by the public in the prewnt ea# if an injunetlan were granted would subnelially outweigh My rmandal ]o~er suffered by the tobacco companies. Clear evldena suggesfing lhat prominent health wltnlng~ would lead to I deP~~e In consumption of tobacco products, with a resulting depeaae in the incidence of tnbueo3eltted Ulnc~t.md·deat~ would, In my apWwl be determinative againat gurdng at Indocutory in]unedotl Given that IUIPW Canadians, mordy teenagers, begin nncldng each ycu,d tht 38,000 Canadians die annually of tdoaKMelated UJNU,lt would seem to me that evidence suggesting that more prominent health wuning~ lead to any material deaeue In ron~umptlon would be ruffident to establish that the public interest would suffer if the operation of the Ad, and the implemwtation o~ the P'OPOKd ngljadwq were lulpended. 1;~~~~3a4la~i~~~luaar the ~tlrmtl lusolutlon of the Fonrdtudold challenges, ununing that the can readies the Supreme Colat or Canada may be mon than thm yeurj~way, If the government were paralyzed horn taking my further Ictlo~ under the Ad for such a tons period of ema the molt ~P~~ing hulth problem In euudl would wnllnu, unchodked Dc rolsts havl!elwwhere rccogni~d the harm to the public Inhrot that may when the operation of public Interest legislation is suspended Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT BI:IY:ERIL IOBbCeD liD 1 3·111-81 1 t:llAe : S[eREtlJIIII~ 0112221111;111 'Tit icPn~,.,. I for Ilca~Jide~blr Period of time pendiq a finll detuminetian as to Ib IMlrY*iY1UI*Unk.nyilI1Y l!erhePs the dearest stltePnenl of the Proper IppnQ to the balance of convenience issue in such cases 18 that of E (U he then was) hi Metgnlaln o, Adrrld (1983), 42 Q1 t2d)/659 M~C), in I passage cited by the Supreme Court In Stores, Mn rutfce Unden wrote, at 668: in my view there[o~c, the balance ot convenience normailY dictates that those who challenge the constitutional validity ct laws must obey those Ins pending the court's decision, U the I~r is cventuPy proclaimed unconstitutional, then it need no longer be complied with, but until thlt time, it must be respected and this Court will not en]ob its enforcement, Sue~ a course ol le~an seems to be the best method at ensuring that our sodlrj Htlll continue to respect the law at the same time as it is being challenged in an orderly way in the courts, fhis does not mean, however, that In cxnp8ond cirolmstances, this Court is pndudad hom glmting a interim in]unctibn to prevent gnve In]usdce, but that will be tare indeed jin my opinion, the tobacco companies would not suceeed in obt~ng an interiotutory Injudon restraining further executive' ecdo?s order the AEI, Induding enforcement of the propcHd rrgul~doru. s it is not insignificant In thls regeld that ehebot k when I gpun to be some dwb! ~vhdhs s ]nlth~oy In~dPn My k obuln~ ~pilul a M131n of the cmwo: 8aehe, eu)nL It whlW ePreer that the adopted bl the hdgl CDPrl II that Injudrr relief auy Issue ssetnst 1 ertinlPursWnt to blulorjIIPd3·~ndwho~cbkypodlh~Kopcd Uat BluM1 Alllus Auodrllon o, 'yhs Qun (lsSs), 21 F~R SDI [E 11 would appear to be ~(l~cd that the statute under which the MWder to ea 1PW,k uncoruJtudanl: P~ o, MfnCln ol Enployn~rl end aPB1)15 F~T~R 2 (F~T~DS. Ihe plndple extends to Ule enforcement o~ frutr?mwb passed by the eovcmor In eoundl: ~ Cdar 8ro3arts a9tt) f~kP, 1 PC 135 ~IDJ, n~d on other grourdfi Dll 2 Ee,l3 (CC~IX C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ~ SENf BY:IY3ERIAl 'IOBAECO LtDld~ 196CCO~m ;~~ls.oz ; I:csAw ; SICREQR]II, 0112120111:111 :jfmi~8lc;n~nlc~n,·'' fioPd with ~motion, upnsrly nfurod to grent pravi~idnd mecutidn of judgment / Na Clv~leHanln DunlPa IIIn my vfew,evtn if the plpposed rcgulltio~u woe pud and the nd Ww ulda~tdy found to be uneonstltulo~ no dvfl aetfon would lie at OreInrhna of the tDb~lff) eompanla for finmcisl )cua rJlfi~ed u 'nrull of the enfwnment cf~,Mau ~r~th wuning "gupLmmb, nw b Ipm ~shunlng chut e;ch La muld k pm~ I 1Xen 11 plendmtfol ~uKnifut dvll actions Iglia~ ~ Clown, Or Crown servants, [a~ acts La pursuant to a statute httr held to be uneohotitutlan~ (or fop ectlcnl lOter held to:be ulthp Pimll j~ma o, Com;nPnrPcdl (1939), 62 CLR 339, Howtv$ OUEh I(tlON M hlceeed only in 1 ~ly limited dUI olasla The lew in Ihb nsud C lueelnctly lumm~ri2od In Yldc, Adminirlnfip~ L~ (Oxford Univ~I~a~ty haq 1989) It 182: It can be uid thlt Idn~nlar~tive actiMI which II uIfte oirlJ but not actionable merely as I breach of duty will found in ~e~n f~ dunugu In q of C following dhutions: 1 II it Involver Ule eommtssfon of a recognized tart such as tmpO88, false ~mpri~onmm! a ntgllpnn; 1 1l it C ectnlted by rmll~c, cg.puimul epite M e d#ire to In)iny $ impmpm seasons; 3 If the Illodly knows Lt It das not possets the power to take tlie Istlon in question, Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 U EN~ BY:IY~ERI~ TOBICCD LTD 1 3-16·92 1 I:EO~ I · SECAETARlk 0112220122l?111 I 'I~"ka~~mn~81Cal~i~o. In the present Cue,assurning that the proposed naJILN were implemented utd ~ter fell LI ult~ Oi~Cb~lons with the ~d, lilbilily it snosl unlikely to arise on the lyb of m Ind~pmdull end Ko$lud tcd By mmly implementing the proposed regutatlonr In g~od fil$ the 80~m(nl has not. eopsJbd en ]ndldendml ~ort, The Sllpicm! Court of eu~ad~ has held out the 1D~plcm~nt~tion end sfplsomed of ttetutes end reguIedone ddch a lubwquontly hJd to be I~vllid will not give rise to I ddm for dlmlg# hi ncs~lgen~ (Wc$ridg~ Holdi~r U o. Ylbtfflpcg, 091IlbeP 957), nore cleint b~~ed cm tho let ol In~mid,~n (C~nlr~i CmB ~PCrk Ca p, Attorney Clnml of SPs~Lllu~n, 11919] 1 SCR /2J, ~~paa~lble that the'tbrt of conversion could he m~do out if I qulntlly of tabilcro produd were selzld for non~mplnn with the ~egulatio~J, but In NCh a ease, illbilily, II any, wwld he limihd to L~ IDltprofits ~ W0611ed with the all 9uentity seized, The govemmmtwwld not In N~h dmun~tu~a,be open to I full Q 9 proslr ioll ~mply ~I e rtJult of drcrPued tobacco purehaa etMbutlble to the rnore plomlnml hcnlth wrmlngt, Qsuly,the second aun4 malice, could not he rubr~u~doleb ~r~ Uird ground, rcul ~nawledgc, is also very Pnll~v to - provide NPPD11 for IUEh an eetlon. Ihe Cases involving ectuel fmawlcdge typ~c~ly involve tBrp Tires ectloru, eb oppowd 19 letloM dono;pwtuml to slatutu sub#guatly found to be ultn ofnr: ~ani~r a tkomron, 11959] V.R ttd, In such eases when liaWltty L estebUlshed, the olRe~ invoIPed are held to have knwm beyond doubt/thal their artions were ua~utho~ed, ludinS, In effea, to ~h( p~esumpdon thet the ICloru were maideur or In b~d frtib a the ~i o~ the mere Pn but the Art In qucrben has km held to he vfIre airaby,~ll murt Is Insuifida~ ~atllTlrtull kwvlnlge ul~fle blldily where the matter is under Ippeel,nd the hr from dux, Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 I~~·'~ ___ -----_~ -- SENT A:IYPEIII~ TOelCCO LTO 1 3-16·82 1 8:IOc~ ; SECR~TARIII~ 0111220121;rlp lej(ll In my view, thtdfcr! of puring the propPd ngullbb* would k anllogo~ i" th" "e~ npolld In C dodd6n of I Eoiieh Coluf 01 libpcll in Bourpin SA D. Mlnlre pi ~N~b~r~ Rriuia mi FoPdllsaal P~k n6 (CM, In BPuqoin, the MW:ll(l ~uod on Orda prthlbldng the ~n~Ml~d "Vky meet bm Eente, which Olda wu lubsdquenlb had to be Invlld L1 being in breech of Ihe European Coa~~ntly'~ a~ltg of Roma VVloul turkey tndcn rued Uu ML~jlcr lor loll plodiu Iri~ng during the period that the inPld Old~\vuinlwa ~lluCwrtol Appeal held that there wu no mure at letion In dunlao~ merely bae~ue the Olds wee unlewful in the ebKnn of an independent 1Dll, whieh eP pldntlffi were ~1Me to rubstlntlll~ Irl were 1e1l lo hip Uleir ddm on thr loll of Pddeg~nn In public cfria! : i" order to surned, the Court olSlpeJ held that the plehtifh WOUld be put to proving th;t the Mintew ~rt~d mlldcudy lowerd them In peering the Order, a! ttet he had eanei howlcdge It the time that he made the Order thlt 11 W~ Invalid Noune ~ added,et 790: In thl~ ewntry, the law her "m! dlomd that I prfnte tndjvjdUel lauld recover dunlgP~ I&1Ld~ the Crown for an infurj nuxd to him by an Ylhl eita order made i" good Blth Nowadays, tN1 rule ft grounded not In procedural theory but on the 'OW\d d30wltdgcmu~t that 1 hUnirter of the bown Ihould be Po Ic dls~vg, L dL olY officecwp~dltlously uld fruIady, a ~t~tt of ~fl~l~ ddeh eM3d hardy be achieved If~Ltr done in gwd 1 ~~k~D"dhLpowm,mn~kl~op~bk : Q thl bets u I:und~ntu~d them my opinion b 1P lhe tobeeta coqn~u would not rucmd in an Ictfon for damages for my iort pmRi luffrred u a ~ult of L Implrmultlllon olthe propord ( i Mwd~~ou~clplcld IhC rutun,11PSW Ib D,IR (Idl PI bCU, b I mo Eulnlil o( d LIIMIUI Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 __· I2nFI~~RXEIIID iill:l:lU: IKOUUL· (1:1I1'III1I :t(,eru~~ regulations, even II the Act were uldrmlrly found to he ultra sires or otherwise inoperative In summary, my vlnu is that no legal Impediment mnwtly prevents the tmplementatlen and enlomment of the propowd ngul~dnpr~ ~h~ decision of the puebec Superior Court is Nspmded pending eppul and the kl eontinuer in full lore!J dlrp EIlm without the suspension of execution of the judgment them appears to be ample recent precedent for the continued enforcement of the fmpugnPd Act pending appeal, absent a specific Injunction t~mi~ng ruch enforcement. In my opinion, an interlooltory Injuneb~on of U nature is most unlikely to be granted in view of the potentiaiherm a the public that wwld result from any order onfolning further actions pursuant to L Ar~~ ~rslly, even it the A~ were ultimately bdd t6 he unconstitutiolid, I believe that the tobacco eompde~ wwld not wreeod In an acdon for financial losses luffued se I result of the implemmtltiwl of the proposed regu~an~ Youn~rmly, rAsK~NccMw~ulcoo~Rn RWCIPI Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT Br:~Y3ERIAb TOBACCO 1~D ; 9·16·92 t 9:52AY ; · 'SECRET~Ullk 01122201221R1 li~~n~dc~i~ ISlll~lnD IO~ICnOll Ilwi L~ID~mnlwkn 10 Irn 1M~YIMm~u~n Irm.L~uu ~Urly ~w~ bnun I I~s~n~ nIJ~tOl ~I1)UJlo~ I~w ~IMLMlt ~IMU~I ~P~UY~II# IIYUH~ IeteinbFf ~3, 1991 laomlool u,OU1FI11Ik(liCI1 rW~Ma BYflELECDPIERANI)~An ahll IUUFIIW ,~,,, R~ka ~uee~ttvo DlredW Il#ula(ar Nan·Smo~eH' Right Asrod~tlon M~ru 344 Bloor Street WtJt Inne o~n~p~ltl Sdb 308 Toronto, Ontuto M5S13~L~ Deal Mt~ Mehood: Re: impianentetion of Nm, Rr~U~ltl~N Imdr~thcTahnecpPrahet~ CaatrolAd Furthn to the bpdnion mt forth In my letter to p of Dmmbg you ~ve 4ked me to ~dd~Jerr the luMdiarl qu#tfpn whether fhl ~k~c~ ~iurl~ Cnbd ALI, SL 1984 ~10, on Cl~g~nl di~ve IPr Pluln PYIPOW, LB, e~oKrmal but not IDlpUun Nd ~gJ]1IPn mlking, pending the Ilppc~ of the fudgmmt of ht, Qlabat, k Indlented bl my opinion letter, the ]udgment of Qubot I~ k by lau pmdfng dlspoltlPn of the Ippel fhe Rlult b tlul C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 rrr·m~l o i nH'P· i I.·b ··~I r, ~o~~C LI ~Co~a~ in CDnndI'l ItltP~ Llbdf to ~ t~hdll I~ to da II of hr Arl t~~ In Y fora Ond ~~ fn the g frhion r P o~)lo~Yr of LI Ad~ k I nuttor of la, ~ I~dr ad be tn Y h ·1~ for cutdn I~pow, d r ~P& J not t,c·, ·d a ~~ca~dy lnlcu I ~pcdnl po~aa Of L, ~~~b lba4 01 L judgmr\t of I anrt a ~ YI~C~~~~~*~~ pt pf 1 ,tltnlO b dOIlycd bt O rpodfIc p#a to IOt ~d ~ b ~a~t4 a whOa ac Supnme Court of Cuud~ dr IOt ~ Ttfculu p~o d I ru L ·mrd~oJ lnd bnnfote I~opa~tl~e~ i I ·dcord thd thl Ybbr or)odb hu 8~ ~~ Uwttf 18~eo OS~CI Idlldbl thC prodPQ In tho Itsh ptriod pmLi d~~dd· of Le OppoOI, B~ they would k lubjKt to placdm lhls C O dlu rocognttion t ~ MLnittu Lu L, Ad ~ Io ~1 Bra ad ~4 ad e Llr~ ~aloreublL in bt OaO ~6 thu( C PO Ltl inlPOdinla!to at Govsrnor In QpQ procadlnO ~ II pant hi to lmpIOrnOnt lhO proposed regJlOtias Purrnlnt to da It of thO Ad. ~ at qurtion of promulgltln8 tk p~p~ n8ulPti6nl f Bak O pdl pdilal h!Ps This pofdd bat rig ICQ L bOtwHn two hdrmtJ prindplos of rapoolYI ~htutlanP dlmPalp. Q Io ·~ kk govrnmonl b Yld torrprt I fndcpOndOot fudIdry, ad a Be othu had, it L a Yl~la to pro'rn II mlfu~ of lu dd~ h bl Iltu Agud, Ic ad· plkat anol qla ad afora tll wttl of luU~ml~, a ~rb~L]1Yd~ jII VittuO of dDP j 01 bl Ad, ~LdPOt b 1~~ Id a cl~apd pqP( of 11I lljislOtlon b "to pbb QI kooith of ~~~ in ICt d ~* aYr Iql~~lP I in ~ddra of 1DOIRI d~nrlt~l ad B~ dllll' md to p~g, amr~ of ~ LPB of tobOceo at b anuinlI ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni SENT Br:IY;ERIAL TOBACCO ITD ; 3·16·92 ; 8;51119 ; ZCR~TAR~YI 0?12220122;921 I f~F~~mn~dlCa~ i' 11 jBoc~iv~ rommuniobn bl pMtinent Infomution to mnrumtn 1 tob~po", In furtherenoe of these purposer,Plrllement has, punuant to Nbseetion 17(0 of the Act, delegated to the Covemol In Coundl the oblidatlon of r~gu~ng the luhuc and ronbnt of health wuning on tduCeoprodudplJuga $ my view It would be Ineonspnant with the government's obl~tion to protect the health of its eltizens If it eontldd itself paralyzed tom taking Ipp~op~ilte regulatory measures pending the dlrppdtlPn of colutlhlConJ, chlengll to cnlbllng I~gi~l~tlon, pa~deularly where that legislation nmdnl in full fora end dfeet dlyijlg the epplll pulod. A rona~y conclabn would kid to Incongruous r~sult~~ Could it seriously be suggested that the Cavunol in Coundl would retain for several years tom designating I new and dlld,ly ncm·medlul drug as I phlbil~d ~ub~tu~ce Ilndp a 21 of t~ Nnr~Pfics Control AEI,RS.C. 1985, f N·l, pmdlngrdotlonPf~ canh$tlond eh~ll~ng~ to hi Lluld Slmllady, would tbr gavanment be paralysed and unsble to protca Canadians, by way of amefid~nents to Schrdule r to the Horardeus Products Ad, RS.C 198f, L N~J, from the impprtetion end Ltrlbution of a hawdous and potentially deadly new substanre, pending the ultimate re~ol~on ofe ch~ong~tothltda~ 1rt is not a mark of dlsrupea for the judge when his lodgment fi appeal, that the Minister of Fy6a has Indlwted that she Intmd~ to ~KO the del that the lildBe dcdmd unmnrtituBod In du shmi regard, It Ir not a mark of Ln~pc~et .lor the lodge that the Cevjmoa In Coundl would pomulpa Ipp~p~l~Le ngulldoru under the pmt Art. 'Ihls Is bemuse Be Ael continues to be legally etlactlve pm~ng the Appert. it b nLe 1 matter of nrpect for Pull~ma~ and its Hdll, Is crpnssed in legally valid legislation, that should prompt the in eoundl to a in the interest of public prc~odion~ Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ·· SENT Brl~YPERIR TDBCCO LTO ; 311·11 1 8:IIAY I SEeAETIIK· 011112012211111 IJonlelnb if pelltlcd conccml pslirt rcgerding the implemen~tion of the proposed rrgul~do~J, I nutiouc yet nsponrlbh pth ~mllnr LVLULblL The govemmult sun ennounoe ib Intention to proceed with the ngu~tlP~ end leeve It to the tobeFeo eompeniee to Inl~lle pmcndlns~.lw In]unah~e ct bdu~$ ~d In ngud 0 tho~~esu~tloru, 31 would then he Lo~ the COPtt~ to dc~a~n~ beud on Ih~ prlndpln la out In RI AI1P~n~ Gmnol p/ M~nflo~ end MrlropdCn Sfpns (MTS) Hmlkd (1987~ 3B D~L~R (JU 321 (S,CCJ, whether aeh nlief~hould be gnnted Fo! Ihu~ luons I ~m d Lhe opinion tjilt It i; iin to the CoP·eT"P' In Cwndl to proceed to rmke end enfom Irgldans under the Toheooo Prodd Control Act in the ebKnce of e court Order to the eontnrj, pending the dirposltion of the Appul uounatrug ~ASKEN CMIPBat GOOFR'EY /d~ZRW, tounm Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 tlNT 81:IYRRIL TOIBe0 ITD ; 1·11·91 ; IIISIIY ; SKRL1MIIK· DllllZD121;tII I - j 1 L i. h) 0 IV Irl O U1 Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ~r II · -~~ I~ ;·I~ ~· s~·l*?~~.'~ ?"" ·* · ~~I~~=1I~!~,~I~~C ·"-C" "" SEn I:URRIII1DEILm il.ll·sl;l:lllili I1WIIUIP I1II1IPII11II ~perialTobacco~mi~d/Ijmilee J110, rJs SI·Ao~D~ 00991 Mo~NL LP~ fl4C 18J (n4 o~lalal ba8or 6100 C~~ Ho~t~s~ P~pl B~e jtb I~SSAGE ~ECOP~BA ~b~ ~pp' tBECoPe NESSAQ_ 161 OSJaOlll bet: ---, No~ldlWr Hwn Nurbr 91 pSw: 31391 ~clr I~UWrrHII ~nlro 41 IYkopl~v ~l~lK trunbw; I ~ML Il~lbllEYBn I ~lcP31·14tS ~cM~IMrul~O~JT C1 O C~le J·4 014.931'7033 n·) lll~·S30·OY1 Engl~u~e 914919 (Iplgl lur.~s~ OLuiranu41 40.1 ~lcOJZ-5121 N.I 111·911-1131 W"00~~ Ilod ,~"~· o~·-·-··· H 114·931·371\ ~.t al~-932·9~3 ~MOI 9199441 11414 alHe~ O"~d~LULQ*L J-S I~eOS1.1911 IACiu~i~cmu I Y~ 111-132·s117 041911140 61JQPm4 OR~IRo~onn*JduaP~ gl 1~~931.)993 ~e~Nr~hWUP1 p~ lllJ31·916 I~t'lr~ ~lt~0 Olluare~~urP~ 11·1 111·911'11 1.1 ~w'93P021t ~nunmrucw ]Wbl Dd ~~HL1" n·a sl~·s32·aseo 9'1 114-932·1410 Sw(vil ]as~u 3r914 ]prlur*rbw ODM·I*M F1 114·952·3170 0 0,391 Uwl, Iwt F1 9111 hmuN j ~c~hk w.l IlbSg'QIO ~H~L~~b~~rQ '141 Hcnn Nm: Ccrrp~JIt~q*l: _------ MnJrO 6 ICloddL1 klKQPi* rundr: ~,tt ~V.~nlllYLIWIIUYRIWnulY1Uulc~un, O nt,tt lPntt r Ily # 111 rEl* ~u ,IUL ·~s~*R~ Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT B~IYPEAI~ ~O~CEO I~D 1 311·~ ; 011~ I SEWE~I~ 1~~1~~~ 2 ~P ~~RAIN -- MIIIIIUl~lbl#I#I ~, MWnOc~OVPltl~llllrt lt~011~YIO)I~ hlYl(O~lkrO)WnIW~A MODtrw~ I,~orkr'~rAssocun· ~ ~ Blaor ~~ ~ 5+ ~ ~ I ~spya I ATfENlldR Yeddl Ylod, ~~~a ~ L~~~~rli~lCI~ st L Ibl LI ar opinion r C tvlethcr r ~ ~ ~~ ~ ea~a~l ~ ~d Irstcc~ n~~ pmum I Nb~Jrdiaa a ~ d~~i r ~~~C ~1~1 t ~prdCC Q~bOt ~ISUPC1~1 ~ ~ Qcke i ~mlpai~ Ibb~eeo W ~ . Preaart~ 8Y ~ k~Md~, (~ UO ~ ~ L ~ IffUrm~ivt, wbdbu C L ~pplk~tio~'d~~blo~b~o~uNlpwtd~du~ ~ eo~tlbrdon~ fU~bj,'~~r d~ ~~m d d RcpJ~~ ~ ~f bnpkmwtbn ~~ Y~ (C~ d4 r~ e~ wt Qbol h ~ 1J1I I~'~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ d~myeli~ LCSlk~ r Id0pt~d~bwPshtL~~ cP~Iore~d ii Ic L L Plbscguen~y ~ Pltfmrte~ leduad ~cPp~t~tka~ P6~p~ ~ ~ ~ ld~l · L~ 1~ ·1~ Y ~ I fumy 1~ ~ FoDaial C~ ~4~ ~ ~ ~1~~~DY~ C Y ~ dec~e~ ·~~Y ~ d· t d~E~m~y ]udlmenl pmwl I YL d b ~ I~ Ra~n ~ Pucbce ~ pucnrl ~ b LCdP L~Yd~MPnhel Illoufidure~~~l~~~l ~uy IJmUN ~ ~MOMP1 a~ LII~ ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni S~NT Br:IYPERIAl TOBACCO LTD ; 5·11·12 t 01101Y t SECRET~ILI· 011222012210 3 Nwrlmalae' Rightr Associaabn Mucb 6 Igaz Pip Z Tac ~ il UlbP ~CI Of the ksidrlht pewcn Of the Paiiaaent olQn~$ dnee h to tqplllte edverttingthronehout Csnsdq ahhwgh Q~etivityWlllmdu Ihe ~cl~fve fsaicdon oltbe provh~ by vbtee of PanoIPtu 13 and 16 a ArtlJe 9t Ollhe Ihr Conohwba 84 rdbl; b) 'Ihe ~AM eonIdtnteI an iPfr~ingemeat a tbs ijpbt to hrcdom of expre#lon a guaranteed by pa~agrapb 2@) of $e CaMdha C~n~tnaRlghr~ Md Rrcdw~ wMeh viol~op ca~no~ be fuf~cd in I b and dtmeonde lede~ ~aiu~Pl~okhllu~lb, IWl,luh aebpl pm~d$~wb~n$d~d~may judgment and dcelared tbe Aa pncdludtut~onnl AEEordiag to the Hono~sbk J~tlce ~BbOl the Ab II ulna.vlrs of the pomn of tbe esnadian Pahament lince h eneroachu no provineid jur~diction by rinuc at Arddt 92 of the Ilu Condi~a~don AcS 1~6~ Cwsegueot~ it b inopcntbt and of no ellect fustlce G~abot ~mhclbeld tbat the Aet dolalu para$aph yb) of tbe bMdion C~ana aTlars~ ond ~rrdonu Md t~ IhertIo~ ioeperstivc' and otno e&n Ihr A~w~y CxPcml of hb U on Ippul cl~e IIjl ~d~nrm kfate Ihe auctce Coun oIAppcd 'Ibe Caurl oIAppeskjud~nent in U rmnerw9 Do~l~tb~ be rendered before tbe end of 10D~ Ibe Goi~or b Ilwnr9 woPld L Io dop5 bPlal iate tclce loB i~p~di(p~ impkment Re~a~olu under rJb~ec~on 11 (I) of Ibe Aa requltial lua nfio, thl tbs n~xP~Pg~ on dkxt~ p~JQga be bolder ad more pron~nca~ In UOht dlhefudpmea~ ~ndsrcd by the Hono~sble ~d# Qlsbpl Oi C SuperIoo COM Of Quebee in I?paial Toba#o ~d a Proe~murBtnaa~du'Corlada, the PKI#U byxhk~(be RcpuladWI are Idops4brou~b~into fPra and f~plamcnrcd teiat certain ~W1IDDS, IIBmC3: b e~a the Cafior 1P Coppdl adopt, brill tnte fores and Inmed~t~ Lpl#ntnt 4101pa~ la dllPe ollP~~PL~OP 11(1) 01~~ ~d dlhP~~ 61h MI ~kJ~d PPma~tlrPtknd bl the Boptlar Cspd a Qotac In ~mp~id fokeo ~ w ICnM do Canada t 8, TPo~jl tbe Cowt pmt an lo]Pnetloa ~lupadlng~~ppUPthi~ 'ol lbt Act and tba adopted end bmp2bt Lto force tbutander ~o~ tbt dontion of t~e rblll~alcl Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ·· ''" ''''~:"'~ -; --------~- SENT Br:lrPERIAL TOBICCD LTD 1 3·11·92 ; O:11C~Y I SECRET~~II· 0112220122 to 1 Righu As~oc~adon Mnroh 4 1992 PnOe 3 -- i odoptlon ollbe RCIP~dODI b the CWUdOr In bPndl Idd 1~~ lmmodlnk comlal Into Ibrec lenoltadiptr I Inch atre~pea lar $~h Qlbot ~ R Cootd thr Clwro be EoPdrmo~ to W duoys II the Bc~UPt~lPa~ ue odoptod, brc~pl Blo Ibm and ralbrc~d ad bl AdL IP~ab~om$ apd ~I1M~b d~Md oa#mltltutlo~t dr~d~a~a I L CIP the 06rrrW11P IbODdl IdOpt, )dPI Into lhrot end IIII~Ld~~b Impl~m~t RCtP~t~pl In ~i~f~l anb~dPa 17(1) of the Ad d8aA the h nu dceerad Pn~on~llhrtlonsl~ 10 81 Glperlm Cda~ of PPcke In ~mp~rhl tobPceo ~d n, Roeona~ Ifalnl do CwB t L~Dl~O~~1IBI~·14·ulrmdk~i~l,~B~a ; (I) the e&d aiLhe judgment nndered In hgaiPr ~bb~ccP ~d; ~ Ibrct#dlbclWUlfiledlP~Btlhj~d~PmtmadutdiPlmpaiP1T6baeeP (E)c~tcllfe end Ihe e~y I my, of the pluJmptionPtEomtit;tIP~nl validiq of & Ac~ a ~tl u the ~nennspdaP d vllMi~j of Ibr ]~qmmt raadetcd i ~npalal Tabocea ~d W IkmhldLtCnl3nil~URL~W h rhdo(lbc]udgrmnl rrPducdb/~s Qba~ il~rbl nbWEPtdl bjthiiununti~h~snd~te~t)lW prdy C rnbjtof to eontmvuey, h ~c~ec~ Ib~at ~Appul la ~ri~ioA M~ckanlaLhJled A ~n~orin, 119es] ua '· ~21, hid UI11 ~ tuuliiYnPnt drclP~ I lan I # unePalituliwul (ihhw I dthe Supeia 0pa of Qutbee ~om ubieh Urts bst hoon no " fodgment oi the Quoke Court pl~ppe~ Imm 3ieb tbere t~t~u no C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 *' ~p7~UI~AC'' :I'u.l· · -'·' to ~~r8lr ~ILO UO ; ~adl ; ~IUI ; IPB~IC ~t11220122;1 5 ZOQDP~ 1C MLI M~eh II L. ~ ~ t ~I ]~ r ~ ~ LI1 b C Supcrm ~ d 1 .~4 p ~~dp dbe ~r b OI ~q L b ~ dA ~ jud]cnta~LSrmryPae LYq~~s~~~l ; ~,bu~ u 9P Yi 1 ~nsr IR·rg P I~~ I ~LI~ hru 14 ~ ~~500~w0~1Q, Lptcmbcr q 8, ~ b ~ ~Y L~ ~ ~ ~dgmtnt~~~reBuLtl~lb~r~l~l~B Howtvr~ ~ ' b~ Llnrl Q~ Pi ~L ~ ~ ~ L ~ Ibla r~114 QI ~ ~i ~a wlp811~ b b~ e~d· oi hklmiohe ~ bd p ~d r~ d I dsdandpn ~ I a d r~ j~Ya ~ ~ : ~ldm~~ k ~1(1~ Ld t ~lblbl~ ~ ~ I~ ~iudpPed nY C Imy~i~l ~o~ W, ~P $~ C1 r~L Ir dcdrulioa d ~abdall l~di ~l]~peadl b ~n Yld~d ~ naCL~ aa~s ~ ~Hlmor~ Cowll ~~ r ~ pmw~cd ~ ~$~ YCi ~ ~ ~1 ~knenutl~n ~ ~ Re~u~tion~ II Ihtrclo~ ~ ~I ~ C rmou ~~ ~ ~~ L Itinp~dshcd ~~ C ~~ a ~ ~ltl~ndcffd i ~mpuial ~~ W ~nmt ~ r ~~ 6~ ~~r ~ ~ R ~ P I I~ ~ ~I ~4 ~ GOHm~ ~ ~$ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~RC 1~1 ~ i ~( ]~t ~IL ~ IdJ ~ ~l~utio~E~ YI Y ~ t I r Lr ~bculd ~ ~ FODhdtR1 ~ I ~ w ~ ~I ~PP#I kalhl ~Lhll ~ jl(Cd ~d L In?pmkr To~occo r g II~ ~~ I~ C lud~sot ·1J ~ Impr~f Tob~eco ~ ~I Ir ~ drhdhcr r a ~ I~da d ~ne~dnrdcnlf d~ ~ r ~~ad b kL Q~4 C ~~ ~ Int d ~ Ibd ~ ~ ~ Iffumatht,~~ cry~ ~ h ~~ ~ ·pl~ Yb ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ hosubac I ~ II C~ ~ ~bertby I I Ippul rrS59 kou31 ~IC ~ I~ ~ judlpP~atl 'R Slvint ~ ~ ~bere pro(Jlwul ~e~doa L ~~~ ~ Ippd I~Jlu~j bro~bt yPhb ~a$l djlel~t' ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni ·· ··~l··r-,~Z,r·~~l IL~~..~-·~ S;EN~ Br: IrPERI# ~OBEGO~1TP ; P18.92 1 8:l2lJ1 ; SEMIETIRllc, 0112220121111 1 NonSmo~cn' Rj~p Pslodation ~lutb 41992 PleeS i I Tne ~o~a$ o[ Article 497 du Cede olCSnlAoc~d~Pr~w the 11199 or whether or not tbe term "txc~Ntiw" corigincd theFctn would foelude tbe 'declaradorf ol aaeooldtutionsll~j m pronounced by htda C~abot In Iquipl ;~b~affP ~d Strle~ epuldnp,l dcdaratinn p~ono~mcrd in the eentext af I· 1 raablpn ~o! dcelwtorl j~d~en~ hued on ~dcle dJ d the Coh 4 Civlt PlbC~dlPT doer not entail "xecudnn' per K Ihut~orc, pac esn ulue thet the · spped bwoght ep~inrt the jPd~nl rendered in I~ni~J TObllEFD lid ednnnt · b~ laid to havt IPIpcaded the deeierstion o~uaca~udhltia~n~ luelf due to the i fia that Arddc 491 oob~ uupenL the ~EP~JPP aad wilhe decla~l~n ol uneonutltntionnllty cmntalaed therein 'Re pmMu~ arMo~ bo~ LI ~rrprrla~on md ~pplilL of Arcidr (97 b I ~ud$oeat rendered on n rpotlon fw dtdantoryjud~aeld kscd on Ardcle 453 olthe Cede d ~Q Roecd~ wut indeed eoPddersd end Iddru#d by the Oueke leeteintnre,wben tbe fhsptercndtled PaJMtotpJod~cat on Motion" 'uu odded in the acw Code d Qil Praeahm of P~kc, Idopttd In 1966 Thlt chepter entitled Pedaratoly Jud~m~nt an Mo~aP' f acp,kw 8ewrdipg to the Commis~oPcn' report, For there ruwFJ the Qoebee It~jlahm adoptc~ Ardek 46 af the Cede of: Q~sJ E~oe~E~m,whlch rcaL u krlfovn: ~ d6 A dcdaratwlfudamcat rendered In lecwdance with U chnpttr hnt the Ilme dfcct end it mbjed to the woc teco~cl u nay c~er ~nal Judemtnt' BY Idopti~ ktiJe db, the Q~Jebec Ic~t rendered dcJllatotyjudgmtrm, Imeh a le ]udemtlll rcPdwed In In~pahl Tb~Pao kl, rabiccl Io I~ ume /rcoo~rs~~ eppli#bk 1o ul other boljud~nan~ inclPdint m Ippul, In hq the Quebee Cwrt dAppul, in Genfljnle l'lmpbiolr, EwnplyA~d'omaanc~ I~J~ psarl RbJ,461, held ttut bl ~hie dArdde (Sb,Afilele 26 d the Codr 164~31 Ro#dun, kPline nflh appeelc ~omj~d~acnt~ oi the Superior eowt, ;dcec ~ppb lp e dedultPryfudgmcnt rcndwrd purwnr tp r ~Dtkn bs#d on IMk]e (S3 d I~K Code p/Chol~mc~d~t~ C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ~c~-~e l~"r",5.. ·f~~:~Fl?~~n~l~JYY;;I;Z-·--~-· SECRETIRI~I~ 0111120 122 1 SENT BY:IYIERI~II TaBaoDo LTD 13·18-92 ; 8:13L t NonSmdwn' Righ~ kccitiofi Mateb bj1941 Flee 61 I ---~I~ ID fed tbs apped referred ~ b~\lliJe,l9landfonolI~i~~ct~eCPdcofCivO i Roudur Ippum lp Bwlm entitled "Rewdiu Apinnlud~cou~ it h fberelore dw~ II r#wne to ~de~ dcdsrslorjlud~mcall are rJbjed at are i dPtbClh~djudgmenlr i ro W OPI~PD, U L I#Y11 Of kdtk 497 of the CDde olChil hoenlun befng apeEcahle to the dcddiog fodnd tendered In r~aiP1 Tbbaeeo ~Eb by ~ifiJe of ~clt (54 aol o~j II Ihe accJtioa of jpd~rotMpcndeb, but the ~udacntiwlrirsodcndirm~and~ithouteftcctu~:gard~~tbcp~ty~gaiod Jo~n Itwar rendere4 md Ibi OubO4u until Ibe Laid jad~oc~l L maintained or : mcmd by Ihc.Court of Appeal o~, ul4Pete)j, bl the Supreme COUI( O[ QnadL IPh~Rl~tnlmo~Cfaa ~t Ihe Honourable J~ubtec d~bdt refuted a rcpwrt for pro~Aa~l execYdon d $ ]ud~en~ nadcd hi' h~ potwithlapdirg ~ appeal (9 1313X the nupeollpo nfenea to In Abkle ~91d the Code dCi~ Rwodure murt bsve Id fun etteq pead~~~Weslotl~llidjudemtPt 'CoaKqucn~ly,fhtpniiaa, of the Ad remain In fun fwec and epctydon uaQ ttr iedtmenl readtRd in Impmlal 1Toboceb ~d fi eemfhmed by Ibe Quebce Court of Allpe~ or uldrmlcb bl the Sup~tme Comt of Canada ~/t~~ttnfd~Pd talLaces awe, olC Fmmpt~oa orma~tlt~lcP11 nl~lb· allbe Act and t~~p~,~b~,dn~oolall~CIPtwd~nd'lP~rbl TO~L~Ud We rma~ now eonaIdet ~vhelbcr tbe IF(Y 0f~rCNtiODOf~bC1~I~DePttGlldtlCd Ip~mpwbl 3030999 ~d pmMnt lo ~els 491 of tbs Code of Oiit AD#L1IPI ean td aome aPlbe ncutnllzed by tbe prthunp~o~ of eo~t~hnhnalvlidig of Ihs Act and tha prwPmptlon or udidl~ OIl~ejUd~CDt rsndsrsd by Ibe Honourable Xlllite ~i~bot ptent~npt~m oi~onrdwdcol nldiy dkg~tho p~ddoa~ fn h Ihsnl aenae gr Iha prwmnptlon thl 1 law Mi eneoted in eerdermlY with the ConttiJnn and Je~4~n$ ~ie-~tv·apllU ~1R).aPr~f~'"lklm'k dwllnd mua me U~lu beauPe Sh ~d psllmpian b ~co~npltlbb with the i~NWl~tjvd·a~l~ CMJU1~eb~dct of th~ eonrtltutio~ca~etmcnt(MP~abP ~G~ vr 3dmePohSYm SlOrP ~d, j1o8?j 1SCR114112~1~' C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 ~pl'lFr~·7' ''*7''1·c..~y.lj ··r~lllY·IU·~ -·~ · SENT Br:IYPWIL TOCMI1TD ; 3·18-12 ; 1113All I SECR~TIIIS' 0111120122;1 B Nondmdkcn' Rlghu Esloeiation Matoh 611992 I - II -- __ Homyr, the C~lfrm C4nna olRiebll ardi~oo~mu dw,uc naet 1bK rule of proeedun eecordlnl to wbfeb the on~ of ut~b~hiog that a law b uneonstlNtlonat her with bwe who enntut luch la& (MrPo~oU~an Sllvu LI~, 2llG99, p, 12~ k for the rule ofeonetreetioO undu which 1 Itab~le tbnt it ecpluted mun, whenever poulbk, be #Ilulrued id~Peh I rmnnel that h wmp~ with the Coonltuda, the Supreme Court d Caande hat n~rd from apaing an opim'on MI the I~UI~OP Of whether pr net UJI rule h ~lplclbk In the field of : tr C~mlP, fhr Sv~aeme Cwrt d Crmda did hoacvu sdnowicdge the EontrovenCI nshue o[tbQ po~t and noted rhst b qw~on arirer oF4 when cnmi~g le melic of Ihe lidedpp (ML~OPOli~pn SIOM U, supm, p 121r Sina the jod~cn~ rendered in I~nlp~iol Tobacco f~ Ikcbred the Let to be nneonstihniwel, by virtue olh ConnfaadonAa of 1861 ~xcD w by virtue of the Canadian &Pn4 bWg~o andP~Ndoms,lt t po#lbk Ec Eoncludt that the LA dw wt benefit h I Foclmnpdop of mnrtimtlOnal J~ty aflhln the : Ilt~ mwanC Blhr Act dcu not kneL h a Im~umption of onodnrdomi v~idi~ (whlch we me a#trminBwithout br~tvc~ mPldng a Mtemenl on the matter) but on the. other hand the jpdgn~a rendered in ]mpuiat Tab~~ 1l bu~eL bool I pre~umph~w ofvrlldity, it could be ne#sfuy to derrm$e nhetber or not the '~ of cxec~op provided for in ~etlde 497 of the Code ed MII Pm~dtur 5e. etunvated by Ue pa~luaqdvu uf r~J1~Url mac~o~ to L judgment rendered in j~RIPVIPI Toboe~o ttd In~jdauaa~ tac pr#eht menu became ibe fud~cnt ·readered In linp~ robocso W do# not.benel h a psuumpdon of In~F~ In ~ci u~nrlcon~emp~u~ed bytbr Supnme Caufi oIQn~dq Icmu In I fudpmmt b not pre~ed (laaPtr xr Yeidr, P9W] 2 SCR 1215 j1280) ?huclwc, tKa Itanw h Ijud~u~ b ndto k puuwd,h ear no! fonR that a prclmnpdon d~dl~ Ipachu tD myf~d~mm~ Ijud~nenl b ~imp~ ptuPmcd not to be laooncel bat it b not pruumed to be vnlid, It t powevel the tttpow'bn$ olthe IB coptutiq the ~6dltloIlfudgment to that f le ormnMttS, we me oIthe opinion that the $ dPceufion dlhefPd~oen; inblubl TobPeco ~d, rcddng from Aro:eie 491dlbe Code o~Clv~ b in no way attenwted and bat full form and effed C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 _· ~~_ '· Ct P.~·, · · '~aRT'n**·T· - ---' ' ' `"'~'' ~*c~,,,,,~7 ,,~ SE~ IY~YPER1~1 IWICCO 1~ ; 311·~ 1 IlllbY ; SEP~T~ly· 1~~~12CII ~t ~cuoci~Pop Mueb bjlff Ip I Y L~qu#dol ~I ~~ L mnucrcd ~ ~ C~ 1 m~Y II Qd pr r·ll r~Ly II~~ ~I Id J be ~~~ ~ L ~ LII t L ~~ ~~ 1.1 Ib ~ Pe g~o h Cound dl 4 ~ e ~d hEotdL44,lp lep~b L ~ d ~blp d ~ k da~ ~ ~dpa:rcadcrcl ~ Img~idl ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ty I~ Eonp~nk, 'dn~ b~D ~d ~Y 6~ I ~ ~1 ~,4 ~IIP~I d ~ k ~ ~ Lgu~jon~ 1~Y id n~oul~t ~ h 61b h ~ hla d ~ Eonrdtu~ dSnet ~ qutrjloa ~ ~Adnued i I cr dcci~l~ ~~ Sycen~h:~ ~ QI ~ Mmopo~nb~l~ LYq~ SPpnml ~~C~undq ~ Blaunbk ~furo~Fe L~ PYI h~ ~ )1 L~~~pc~dio~~lyy 6l1uac~a r ~14~ ~~ r ~tu~e ~h pp~lb ~l~kL dl LCwry+ldl~l~i~lfol~bivlagh ~ I ~~# d~m~ PC~~~l~(,,bEn~culvEadwl Yi ~ I hepulY ~ iPIMJU~)I LI~~ ~Y d~ C ~ ~ ~I ~ pf~ b ~ b~ plntfnl·~~l ilulosawl ~4 pendinl I L~ I ~ mak k ~ b ~ rq LI 4r ~ I~lh ~~ LI~ y~,~(~ ~ ut r C Ic~don I C ~ dLs 11114p d I I· al b ~~ ~'~ pcrh~ ~~ "II ~· '· ~ ~ CoMI 1~ ~1 Y Il~t~di~iPn~lppuo~ioII~~ ~d~Pd~oeoweiar, k ~ dy~ AC1Pd b L pd~~pY~yl~bl L~C~~~~~~~ll~~~lr ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni c ~ =~ PYI~ r ~~·-' sC~ n:LIEUK IUPIUI : ~I~! I InYI: E~~YII' 0112220121;110 ~Pl~~d ~~ hupdslop Muchqlm - I~ P t Ic~~ C yt d ~R be ~~ at~bliJltd b la 4r ~ d ~d~ e Sto~ll bit + ~~t ~Ilmw Ic r~ quud~ Itlfolu yrl· L LI ~td oI I ~~ ~ tractlocut~ ~ d proeee~ sc~ IPCndOll, ~ ~ dd~ d ~ ~ldDI~ Y~ d II ~phadol pd dal d~ ~ rd ~ b~dl ~dqa Id bpl LI ~o, ~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ a hYe t wbahe! ~ L ~ d~ ~~ r b ~ L ~ ~ · ~ cbPeede I~ ~ ~dtPbnl ~dP d bp ~ adr ~ KTiDUI P~P D ~ deb~teb L a~ 1~~ ~ ~ ~e~ ~cmarpltce L J~dee ~abar~ tewiu t ~ ~d~a~! ilr~aiPI ~~ ~ Imp~bk ~um 1 & t~d ~ C la be~e ~~ ~ ~ scldql 13 ~pKleccdinpl ~1 ~I incp~nbls ~q I~ ~ L1 p~ ~ ~ ~a ~I icepdbk ~ ~ Plpenu~d h b Irp a bl ~~ t q ~ I~ ~ t 1 C~ d hd k snphui~l b b Err Yn La L l~~a·~rn~~~,luu·~u d~ a 1~ L Y a ~ b I~ bq id ~ ~d ~rumq ua~ich ~ ~~ Ic~ t ~ m~ntlf~clum ~ ~P ~d ~ I ~ttcmpl , i ~ ~4~~ ~ b~ ~ i~ I~L ~h ~ ~ RYJII~O~ I ~~~~ II cnlweelbs~lort ~ eoudnktlll clrlleny die Aa ~ ~ b4 Icdbd b CCnut~ ~C ~elmposdbl~t n r dc~~a i Y ~cond 1 ~d ~ rtt I~ ~ nS ~ Coo P~ b i~ ~ 1 ~ k ~ bpirda, ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Rclu~lP ~Y ~ Id~l ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ b~m# d incomcnlw~ ~1 ~ ~e C~~ ~I ~ r ~ waddercd ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni .su~· .c~.,-- ~n ar:lwFenr~l tao~cto l~p : ~ 11 op : p:ll~w ; cecnt~l~ I OllPOP0101;,11 nldlotea' ~a k~Laa MUEh 51~ hp 1(~ I - ~I ~~d~coPnnharl ~ ~yg~y k br Y ~d ~ ~ LCI ~ ~aL ii~lmopo~an ~ ~ bY ar a plblh~an n~t ~ ~~l~cn~~r41, balana d ~~ovc~el~ ~ Pcaounb~ Y ~ tpllin~ i ~ I eff IPd I YI ~P~ ~~ art ~ !a d0 n ~~~ bY to h co~thu. ~ b k ~I~ q~ ~ b ~~ p b ~b$s8~bl~deqdi~tclkcutoly r~ ~llbl ~ Ilal t ~dg IL1 LClkl ~I( I la~ ~ t ~ Fownon~ tfrPlma: ~ po~idin~ II ~~ d ~YI nniou rd r dl~l r~l r d ~ 1~ ~I a Lnri~lrl, byPc+l d~ L~ ~~ ICIOPI#I ~ ~ IWlm~DWII, ~ Itpe~oa ~~ t wa~ide~l I ~ ai~p~l r~ b Ilbo~iag d IPdC ly ~d I L ·L1 4 dYdq ~ ~dol d~r~~t~ 1 r ~·IL ~ L ~~ ~ iawloaimy ~~ ~ ~ ~· nupndw n ~ T c ~ ~ldk at ~~5~~~k I~ ~ C lulccp~lbll tmpma~i4 I i~l ~ ~t d~ aa I~ Y r ~ ~ CaJdl~don ~I ~ ~ · "5 b r~ h ~ I~~ t ~ I~s ~ ~' dcp~e ~ ~ ~ tmpd~nt ~ ~~~~~~~hwtyc~~toppcd ~C~ ~ ~4 J u~ t ~ ~ ~·~ ~e L~~~ L ~ La ewdidentl~n ~ ~ ~ d rile d l~n ~ ~C t dwc~e~ k ~ ~ cxpeFte4 LI y ~ C~ r~ Y CC ~ LI Pcgtht, L Iwlhl ~ ~ b~see ~ I+~ I~ y t mcwuy Ih ~I, ~~ o[ p~ I~P $ ~ ~ kl d LI ~ ~~ ~ i a ~IY~q ~·~ Ld I ·r~ ald~ Lg bk ~g kY t rcnaneorb ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni ~_ ". :~.*y~:~ --~·~~, '''·~i··~; - ..'L:t~~'l·~· "'~4YU~e~;..- SENIBI:IYPERjdL TWACCD LIII 1 1·11-11 ; p:lliM ; SECREILRfII~ 01111101111111 ND~S~bkce'RighuAsrode~a hirch 61992 Rge II[ hal with thota adwWa U ii tbc~ b~ nny falQFd tdna ~om tlut dthr p~bUe to whkh tbty pwe Lbe dude impolcd upon Lem byna~ hlr,l;ltiol'~d~duplgcl(B P he oC btP4 ~ht pub~e ialehn nwm~ ania 8rtalCr ueieht hi SMUT pi wmpllanse with cxi~ip~ led5b tn Fupadoa cuu wbca Ihe Imp~gbed ~,~:IM~4gplunllpllubu~gl i YwhaK~.~kiKd"Uulcmyywr9[K~Qlbldi~~4~nPblhem~c~Bn, I ~ UP ~moldng lad Ih~l 3BP03 Qdil I ycu L; bom lob~re~rckrrd ~K~Je~ It Idiom Ihnt Ik eaa k Iumrd tbu! Ibe ddit~a on~eiCrwe .pacltsguafmn~~pro~ncm!~un~o~iral~dloi ~Pnl tCd~w~ Eoarrmptio~ thtt wooM be~iekatl to c~tabtbh thatIlablic bcaltb t~Puld k ~~cAnandRcg~~t]on~awrnycndsqIPdanelo~ dels~4 IWlhr dumtiol ~1~ CQY~Jbboa~Jla~Dge, Im~nhowcvetncte 'b~~in~mppiolrobaew~al,Jlmk~Qku~l~db~L~oool,bmlncd 'La him had sl molt utablWrd i ge~ulQlly Iha! Ibe bur61 d tobaceo· Igdvcni~two~dhdlucp~~mwaPp~rm~s~UI0J, i jHwvP,lh~ab~ pi of Be Act aPdReplrtlwlliJwPtPtMpubtie health ~a~ ~Jlbo~ Ue~Q"wc~ukde$"ob]cF#ve II al the AFt fi lpcan~roleihattfng aadpramalfo3 ut ~ob~eeo @IOc pslX be ~dmo~CEd lhO Ibe Bgbt nClpn tobacco ~brclc.rmut~tulu 1 ;rj~deng impMM oblcdhr C I f, 'd democntie wc~cy L oun 0 i~f~4 fOWP(0mlt~l ri9ht 9 bec" dP[P~C~1 IFILIIP~C~ bllbe O~na ';9"0" 2294) 11 b h~on I qPu~n 0~ 1" public b~hn ~ bL Qlat ~UfJ~g~fld~~mmn~p4'dedd~dbl$Suplcw 0" opinion, ihe rrmmhe~hn Ol~o~ero uPOdUW sg plOb~b~lb aplbb tpn~ec ~he Coun Iba~ tbe~scoaamiehludthlp wmpre~a overda~o~pl to laeepuarcimsrcff Wemull,~PMP~,krlhat~he Jllltica Qlbo~ bO~LRdtbcAclrmcpldhniaJ~q~plb~~~~pd Billll pra3dwtni executfon of Y I~dBPIPL Ihrdpnspd$Op~iem tho nwaaarcn ollobeeo pPndoclldpro~lbSbun~bl,,,,$UI11 Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 *-pC~l;iLDt~~Z~'''' "-·'"~~-` P~ A1PIII IrPO UI ; ~1~1 I FOI ; L~nll~ IPPRI~O ~o·glLcd ~g ~O~bP Much ~ ~ - -- -- ~ Y od Ct LI kd~k ~ d b k ~ Rep~ticnr, ~ ~ du~tion d ~ w~tilulP1 dd~ Ib~ ~ ~~ bC ~ j ~r ~! ~I at la~~~ d~mnll~d~ Ipplit~tlan ~ Le ~d (p( LpCda L ~ +r t aue~R- ~ d ~1 kl ID~d b ]IdCPt ~ b Id IklPLIJd~ T060#0 W ~ ~k6LdR~UL ~hWanakCI1Vl~klYI, gll ~ ~Rrddon Mrc~JcJ Idrfini ~; Pmaunu G6~CrP~ L pll~e ~ L ~umP;w ~~~, g~? aoa ~ h ~d qrtLI IYd IssL ~ ~nd 1 La qb C ~~lr4~· ~ ~ I~F~tl·l $ II ~r C bid J II YIJ ~~I ~ b rl h~~d· Ild ~1Y ~ ~a Ir~pld t ~rdo Qllbad B ~upaad I Y ~ qou~~ ~ r b ~(I dinfwda L~ ~ BPwnbk Jwtiee Q~~ radcred bo jldgmnl i l~ai~ ~p 1l J ~ ~ d~B ~ C ~ mcmbcS ~ Y ~ LI ~~ ~ a Qlcke ~I · ~ IC be jPridi#l il6 ~ L, pn8ud~ do#rin~ ~ Kp~nd~ ~p~oM ~ ~ ~ ~ Canslrdanlq I~ b~ r ~· leic~mine ~ squu~c# ~ ~t ~ C blentcl~; ~ Co~tl, ~ I d~t~clan bet~o#n YC ·1 ~~ b II ~~ r r ~ I d5tlnetir batme~ Llbupe~lo~ ~ ~ r ~k Id ~ ~~ d~ t L ~~ L L'pueol iaJtulcc,ll judgme~ r~~~ ~ ~F~pcrlaf Tphocca W L ~II fud~mcal t~~l bl~ lir~ ~a~r Illmg dH 81~~a bl~ r L ~4~~ ~ ~oI or ~ Oupwlo~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ 3~ I~L t~ Jlutia anb4 I~ ~ Y q~ ~ ~ mtmbor ~ Ilfupcslo~ ~ #naot ~~e ~ ~rt If~ectr~ t ~ Ippesl,~ ttrJlthl Nlpn~ian,~ L, ~~I ~1 bri~ ~ La ~I~ Reaulldonr ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni SENT BYIIY7fWIB T08#e0 LTO 1 3·11·91 ; 11111 ; SECBei111115· 111111P111:lll ~ NabSn;allcn' Righn Auoderion Muth A 1992 page Ilj - -- wsuatlrm olpmn 'Ihe leJnue of the Ihr Coanlnuion AcC f867 provider Iw a lepPratlcn of I P3WU,ktWCCn UL k~slPdve, IbC snthF rod $ i9djF;nlY, ~I~PCC $ Co~att cannot fpyg~ thGm#hCI k dGE~LJOLII Ofthe eRAltiYe 10 I~p~ lame adopted by the Itpilalivt, i Ibe poven onueilod by tbe aewmy i U fw i ~ Iwm of~po~dd choke rnadc to adopt and bring into force Rcpllticn~ camng in any mat, be rwtraiged by the jndiciary'r pnvcr c~p~ by a juagmcnl dsliog the force oIns jjadtwe Failing mchfud~acnl, the executive I entitled to nz16: the powen conferred upon it by t(le Act In the pulls i~uerut in thireeK,thejpdgtnent rendered in : bprri91 ~b~eFo lid in notyet Ilnd 'Ihcrcfon, mcb orube dpowu,fn the lasm of the dop~on end ImplLwntsdoa of RegJ~doo~ doer not eonndmte rad mtut not he CterprPkd u eolutltPting I mart; of dlrnpca for the ludidarl Power~ le) Llsnrchy oltbe CoP~ 'Ibe hjerurby of the CoPm in ola ludleial rFcm in Ipc~ tbat pdpel d the i Suptria awe 119 rmddom thn U dceislraa my k qpulrd to d~ I courtt and therefore that their dc~t~jolu are not ~med~e~ #eculorl~ j In ha, tbo rypn~ion otcnee~l~n d~Jud~m plo~dcd% la Ar~ekB of the Ccce b0~Roecduri8 expfd~md, I1I lean la ft $~m~i~ bierarehy of ~e Couru and by Int dwire of the le~o~ure to malniinaaritive law wMe I Ea~e i bsn aaacal I ~ the mun(lme, it fi rcaum~ble for the Oavwaor In BYa~ to eondnuc tOllEl in Fontonnlcl altb br actual order of pitive tew swar~g ladsq untn it L Irm~~bllu~csma~uigLBpla~.. Ikrcfw5lkaple ~ j~gmmt IPdClsd L hpabl fPb~w Ld ~o~ eom I trfb~mal re the Superior Court, the aeperation ofpow#a rupldng ~am the nK Aq 1d67 and the Ync~ dCoudl of aucke anan at to opine that the adoption the Reeuladont In virtue of the Ad by the Gwcmm tn Conned and their Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT BY:I~:ERIIL TOBACCO LTD 1 9·11·82 1 8:I'IC~Y : SECRETIJIIII· 01122201221i11 NdnSmo~cn' ISjphP ~od~tion hiueh 6, 1992 hpe U -- I- ~mmea~te romiPg Ipta ~w# dou net bdiate I heb o[ hlpn b Iwtice QsbPI or Ike Soperioi Court of Qcka, ~e Ib~ qlutka tnutt lbcrcfwe be entnutd la tbe Pesaa~ D, bid tbr bnaa he EoPdanned 'O #u ~pmC it he Rq~oa~ uc adopted, ~:~o~$l ~bmd md h ~a ~ sbwp~sdl IdlWw~ dsl~nd In principle, $Wirl d Ibe ~ewa it dervmincd by Ibe Irm o[ Ibcj~idinion wbtn the ~ht or enn a[dipn uaa (sec Scetjoa I,Oocll UoMlirl Act, RLC 198~r CJDZ In thir earc,djurjsdicdonb Gdfinl 0 detumlne end could k;Plbjctl to cooswurl. 'Ibcrcfore at ain Ltnaoc for tbt purporer ot Ihb opinion that tbt rigbt or eaw olanion arose In Pocbce ed that Queke eh~ laff rep~atno utncoa"apll &Wltl Ippkr ~~emmchu] ~bPi~~ P~kr Im b b~B;d on Ardde 1Wl dg ~nl Code cllowcr Canada ~drb redt u aoaw: rml bmy pnon pp~b~ d dtom~ rigt IriaP rmpl b 'tlpomuWe fcP Ibe dunsp oeuled by bit 1l to aaotba, ~met b~ por;dve Jet, Improdcner, negl# or ~ of l~n~3 I*barmll~ariYPuliabimlp~dppcit (I) 11 emmin II fault; (b) the ui~n~ totten daollgu: and c DnlllidYLn~.MUtU.~C IbctoPDCpl~Bullinl~kccMl$hae0mplerPotion~~MehpmpaHl~ybcdcfipcd u an Pnrightt~JI ad #aamhtcd agdinn h" dgbP o~mothu, Ihb I~otiw. D[hPII bdudcr Im amfripn uodel a pte~d~tinp du8 ed the vtoladon of I atandant of Fonduef 'Ibe rimple Eemtrawllon d L IO1 P~on h not weuuEb~ I huh ed dw not ncoeaarily entail eM1 Pbnl~ olths drllaClentt h PIDPold ~labjeL d~]ee~l pbidlan indy hawww he pertinent la sua~n~luehecm~a~vcntIcmVdPt~sBb~,ll~nl 1SCR ~for an analPpy~ cWN"Gm Imu lee nK Oucm K sattmc~nurm IPluP1Pool, C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 I ' aan~~~ I Innplm ~nSr~c~~ ~ k,Y~ Mueh(l~ On tba 4that Y ~8 ~ vta la thoald a ~e~tie~Dj ba el~ltied a I 6~ a quui~of~e~ ~ a a al Q Y IIYg d b rba Clpada the ptiadplc tlut Lalldiy of F t ad I a dhl od aat 1 L 1 ~~ o[ ltbnlY rW~Drid~ Rblklng ~ r L Mc~mpP~LPn CRpomdon ~ Glnru tlhnip~ pal ra nimb r)dt ptfadpll a fonpwed bl h Quebet Court d ~~ i ~mwur r ~ ac PlminJ~ p~q RP, ~a tbo ~ L oa hbllltj tJaPlh LI i~ dl4~~ ~I PCpia a, aer Y, Ainc~po O ccnlardau admb~im~l~ b Llh~ 1~ L LI~ vvoa ~t he, p sq Bowcvci L1 Sulmmr Court d b4 i tbo aa ~M~obd ~Y~h~w ~ r L eulm, gnq 1 SCR ~~ r r o ia odoptd b Nmsa thdo ta L a upopia 1 tiubcls 1· fndamnlfialiw C1 rceh C~ol thc riBht to ac Ldcmoiti pqrbk bl ~ Gown Haar,tt an bo plLI tbo (Zam a L C1 id i )11~ 6aadutat4, aad toltb ~ atrapraomoda a It atoitcd It pp r ~lda ~1~ 16 ardro pla cauttdo 1 YII~ YS dtbo h (Ronumlli~ D~plm~F,~~ ~a 111~ bl ~ map d dQ bQ 1Y a ba ~d i ~ pat g to amr Y 6drj i PldC~~~~hll~la~~~ dtrmgcr tvhlch tht manufaam~ of tobacco produeo eald daiaIouldbc thc P1 ]olKt Icl d tbc ~r actpiad $L~I r~ L ~dr~'~ ~4 dedru~te ~d~~irmrcl aq tbC ~ a ~ t oonde~ned to ~(UDqUIC ~ ~~ LS ~c~tk~u from the Yt ~ ~~ ~ day rd b dal Y botmon ume ~·1~ ,I b b balaea d 3~$ b dmplo d~P d a poldbEl dar la Ird Y LY da I I Il~tt mraw thit ~ que~on,~ aat dit6luY tha IaPaking: )tbo J~ rl kidba La lad aftbo ReguLtlPlu;llq a tbo other ~d ~ /thc r or a;satioa ~ rnly bc ad to alcra L LgLdwr ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni ,c,,~,,.,,,. SVIT BY:IY~ERI~ TDBaCCO LTD 1 j·111·11 1 9:181 ; SECRETIIL· 0112120122;111 NanSniab' Rlghu kro~~ ·····~ M~eh ~ 1992 "'4 laPptlOS and b~lp~pr IOf0 mrce d~~ aso~tlopl k meadan!d pmio~uly, me Qo~Dn dpsl not Iwa,$ Clncipk, mi liabllitj tbuough mt urtei# ofltr kgSbtht pomr k Im mt p~clpk ui~inp he~ mt Sppreme Court oa d~nlta~a ~~M~d, it it dcu4 a ~pplleabk, Thcadop~nmdb~hgLiort~d$LCluioPld$$epnniMiol~ i chellcnBc WWW notWDlljfJtC IfsuliPQ~k~rinllew Ice Ihe kt~ Ihu~ in forcr, me apptni LbQg rupend(d Ihc'i~d~la! Imdeltd in Impuiol Toboeeo ~ Funhamorc, we pwume La the mulu~aurcn of tobacco · ploducu could ootpla that Ihe Gwcma ip CDMtJ adCd h bad faih crwfth malice ip adOPljne and brinping intof6ree b RegJl~tioa~ Itnppidn to na t~ fn adcpltnp and b~in~bg Lo Icra Ibe RegJUon5 fin! Gavunm to Cdundl ~Wld pn~ be cleltiiag ngulatoly pwn lp ~ue of me Aq w~eh tt would ; be ucrebtng b me fa~erut c~ public buellb ; Ponwing Ibr Idopkm end b~p tom Iwre d tbe Rego~dPm dwing me #MFe of tbe eorsdbldonal chalkp~c, me Pwaachpcn of toboteo pmduRI · could Is~e Ih~ (3) dificteat dcpr i f) ~omp~ywlmlbeRcpJla~m~ I ii) a mmp$withthe Rqlafi~ / m) Kek minlulocutoty IqdJPD~LCdhl~L /*e.4~on~jpcrtiam~[Pl~epwpPKlo[lbi~qucidonifleAet b fi~a~ and Pltimn$ly dcdared unwnrdtutio~ul t) e#nplllaakfthtbcRe~~b~ion~ filhe manufaoturcn cItob~e~o produo Eamp~wHh the Rcpalatiopn,rn " 01$ Opinion met Iby wm not be Y to Reo~w me ogwuu InNmd w C p~o8u ]olt doe to n deawe Ln IJg nia Ihe dPp~lw and b~inginl Iplo fnrce at tht Reg]ltio~y fa C jlb~cnce of bad faltb w rmllec~doaolm~utit~clbulrbpuekchdlrwba6p~thcutlti~e oIlepai powar ta C intutrt otpublle b~t~ C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 SENT Br:IYPERlAI TOB~eeO LTD ; 3·11·81 1 O:IBAY : SECREIIRI~L~ 0112120121:i111 No~ajo~~~'RiJn~huadadon March 6199t P~e q U) non~ompu~lanl~hbeRya~B~tlonl if le mmahchnen of tobacco pda de Ipl co~p~ dL the RcCletions they dl Potk sMt to daim dan~agc~~am the Qoem rlncP tbeyPnnPoliaR~sqexpe~ue~locwnp~QUlcRe~o]Ulwu In addition the mMUfaCNren ~i~not k Ible to eiaim my Iw of FaP~tr due II dtffuu in daler linec any deaca ewM not have hen rawed by the Rcg~~tion~ wit]l which tbrj bm pot eamplka i Ut) aeekingaa Intcrlato~t$o~proeecdinp Htbt marmfaawtg oI tobacco pmdua me I motion tw iPltrlocutwt~ $ dptoe#dh~~ a8th rt~ped to the j~el and Rceulntlont which will have been Idoped and brought Into Iwce lad luB mdon b denied by the CcmC ~1~311 Eontlrn tbnt the mannfsetunn nun compb with the An and RcplatiODI d~nln9 the cone ollbe ch~i~udd rhslkn~e~ Seeb nfu~ by the Cp~ $ nupe~ applieadbp of the Asl and RcpkC during gpell O[jPltiOC QlabpafudSmenl wo~ Eon~l~JL ia I ~ny, tnlblrmltian d the Gaucmal in B~m~lll ~is~ to adopt sad · b~ing hlD lea# the Rceullltlo~u, Tbq the Copltl n~uul to gmst aa IP1CI~AI1C~y $ d pmeccdil woPld EI~t~J1C I $pliCil Idmcwltdgtmcnt that the Gcvernorin CoMdl L] not eammiltcd a faplt by Idopdnl Ipd bringml into iDtff IhC R~!g~ioa~ dudap Ihe eonrtitJtioaat cha~ulgt~ On C other band, If the modanfot inttrfoeulorj Ily Plprocledi~ wam Onated by the OolnS tbs manufaetnren wopld oil bye to eamp~ with $ Rcgulldonr ~I~ywwM tbutfnr apt bs~a n~d say damagu m a mil d the adoption and ~aingia~ hto Imrr nf the Repliationr Ho~mz IIec mannfactnrera rmPpbdtb the Rc~dont and they later O~f~in a amy elp~oocdingSI we me otthe D~JWI L they Muld no~ In rxh OK, k abk to calm damy# from the QPm I# mch da~p~ ~PUW,IOT ah PPIE~C~ otaPmy have been Qwd by the drily af the mmmItoInmm to rt ~glfrm~P no dnnJmdbbujurn hvnjuru I~pl~n~ohtlaa olBe ReCoCnool annnr lo~h~ qaeldon, Eonmideriy the mea~ af E~eulonmderta~en in to enforce the RgsllGonq k more ditfid md mpt be quai&b In fag C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 EEnT I'I:IIIP~IL TOICO bTa : l·ll·PZ : 0:ZO~J1 : DRETARIII. 0111121111:110 NonSmhn' Risk AlMcialion Muth 6, 1991 Plge 18 I - - -- ---- ( we me of the opi~i~w that 1 Ltlnct~a mult be ~ode~ktween the meana of enlorctmeat wbld! may be wed to enforce the ReOnlatlem lee ~ueh mwu could lead to dlf[erent cMuequenw in the area oichil IlaW11W ~I~ Fa~dpl mraol pi enla~e~rmnr wf~E~ ~y be mcd lb epfora $ Aa and i Repelatlomareaatollo I) penal complaint (en Scai~a 1B of b Aa~ q ulrell and ICiaVe (KC Serdon U Dtthe ~dr We wm ww eondder both nuol of enforcement I] penal entnptaint IIhe anng dperal Eomplalnrt a~i~ manufiaprm ebtPblcco praduea fw not #Imp~ins with the Rhgntati911 edaptcd led bmught h~o feme du~fml~ the Eolub~otlaal ItacngE wwld pot ColulfMe a laultin OucbFe dvil bw even ittbe Ad wwe ~ub#quMt~ declared uneoradMional Tnir would be aafmple eur of the ucrti~e of a ~h! paidcd under the h wbole lot# and dfea bad been In no wrj ~pendcd during the eonnillrjooal Phaaenp 09 the other hand, L h very improbable that the mllanta~ac~ 01t6bdCea P~UCP UW]d rutter am d~magel ~uhattonu $ the limpk ~i~ of · penal ~ompWmu, it b at~a lmlt #Min that no heal wnkmnltiop would be p~onopo#d ~a~t the mrm~autes befwe the COmtitntimYl ehaaeose had ken 6n~1) deddtd lberefore tt the Aa it dedued ron~tuliaaj penal complltl w31 fol~ their normal Ewne and be dedd~Ed by the Cam Ho~cver, If Ur Ant b duL~ tlocermd~ud~ penal compbinu prm be ullomCdesPI lanPlkd by the Coud n#refwe, no dtmqa map be Ineuned by the basm u a twlt of the ming Pt peed camp~tl In v~a~o pt the k dPimg the constlt~tloaa E~ullenge~ ~ urj event, a elalm L damaFI ls~i~~ thc Qavn L ~bp~~vp penal #Impllint~ would requirt that the pklnrlilpmve net only Ihe rbrenec of Iwonable and probable g~aPnd~ for ~i~ the blmplaintl but Lo the Ib~aP# of a le~ltmlta ob]tcSbs or motive, Ec~udtudng an abnae or Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 IIRII1P· ne : RI "·C *·C' ~uy~ul ~ la phnil d La ~~ Imo ~ pmpa~u br ~d t ~ at br~d rl Y r ~I co~tlt~a r ~~ d ~ b ~ Yd~ GcMnl g ·~ n ~ n O~Jario ~~, pig I rCs pq, ~s~ba C Y ~ ~ unnac Ct C ~ oly~ comp~iat Pdl be k·dC~·L·~'L purpo~ d ~dd~ ~ cononrldr dmb k Pd bpldau ~Q Ip sled C b~~ d~ ~ ~·d~pl ~~ ; 4 la~~~d~lBn ~ L m6dl ~ n~ ~ Y ~o ar~~ Qra~ be do Kuda rd riaus~ ~~ ~ L tarritd ~ ~dr Lr k L b~ ~ r ~d dsdd, Qr Iwebc~ ad Jar (~d ct d~( Is rlnial I+IC aY fonrtifur J~ ltd Illidot~ murnu ~~ ~d ~hltlt~X I ~ L~ ~ ~ Y I ~ ~ rl d~mngc~ ~ ~ Qorm Q 4 ~ Lb ~ ~ ~ Lo ddh ~t Ib uetti~t dLe ~t d IcitJre providJ ~ Ilc~ Ic k waJtfi~r I rcuaoabk ~ rra L~ II anfortffq ~ k pi Icguktioal ~~ ttmtjn ~ b 1~ ~ ~PAltOdPJ YOI~ d ~t d mGt~Urtl I ptptcetinl pYe b~lm r4 II~~ mn ~ pa e~ an~la~aPr~l L la ~~~ ~ ~ hdl ~ I ~ k I Ibgat dd~ unw~ul~~ i 8 Lnmine I L ~ ir~aq Kuebel ~d ~ln atlr;cd a ondu b b ~ ~ caraI~tknl Y,I ~r L~ cxc~dte, 11 Ihcrdore ~ C~~ L ~ld ~ ~ ha ~ I~mapstanecs ~ ~b P~~ldn~r~a~d bgla~b~~ L lecotd~oee ~L ~ putlrm]r ia L ~1~ 1~ ~ d ~ eolutl~rl EhalleS ~I ~ ~ Is ~e~tcba ~1 ~I~ ·~ eankd at dl b r~~ ~c~ i b~·~~bether I~ ~~ d cofaccr~t ~ ~~ rd eondfrd I Y ~lf &~, n~duinl Y Y L ~ ~a dLq~ a ~~ ~p ~ rr 1 d~lS ~ld I #ueh d ~etdtc,~lr fmp~~~~ IcCJ~d~ all ~~ ~ ~ e~nlcl ~ r b·pd4 ~YI ~o ~~ta b ~r dbl Co~ddt~tlasut ~~r bclare Ic eounr 1 I I ; i N ClibPDF - v~~fastio.soni SENT Br:IYPEAIdl TOBACCO ITD 1 3·16·91 1 8:21AY I SECRETM(t~LI 01122l0122t121 NonSmaken' RlgL ~snd~licn MslQ 4 1992 hy 20 - Thb fowtb qwrtion mwl therefore be aa~wt~d In the ncaative, uccpt with nlpecl to mwu of erJMcement, IIICh O KUEh ~d Icintft, whicb w09ld have to be p~cd ct with ~Ul~mrmpriPall~yhloonddc~don$lDtw0l~~mn~UPI Ucnpk~z~lhe " cnnausl~a~J B~cd on and Nbjd W the tore~o~Pp, M are of Ule opirjap uhlt: ~ the Governor in Council may immcdialcb Idopl, bdu~ so lone lad bPplenrnl Re~u~doPr in virtue or Rlbaslon 11 (I) ol le Ad wrJlhnt~oding tbc]odgmun rendered $hnpaiP~ ~ObPLcOW g ~meYnw Glnlmr$ ~in~ddal'upcr, ~ anin]wedon awehS bcfort tbe Court o~Appe~~u~aducdiujedgmcntiathceue Of I?pai~ Tobacco ~d, whie~ rcb to day, le~ tbr duntiop ol the eeadti~uabn~l cbuntnsc, enlwecmcnt d the her ~nd Rcpulaioat ~doplrd kadbrought Blp tw~ Ibwld be denied by the fa~at; (E) the Idoption otRepJladwu in~irme of Ule Adby the CovcnKo in CwrmaZ and the immediate eomipJ ~ro leme end fmplcmea~a Ihcrwr \ould not coord~ub or indie~e a la~ a~ppdlOlthl HwPunblr]wtiee Q~b~M·lhe Court olwhicb he b a member, Ic, Le 9uperinr ~b~n olquekC (9) fbc:Qaan ahcnldltDt be eoPdemPcd ta P1Y da~P~ if the Rcgnlatlolu art adopted andbmoghrinlp Iorec or Ugenll coqltiall are hLd Mdu the Ad eKp if the Ad Ir IPb~egpcng and ullim~cb deehrcd u4eon~tub~olul HWHr, mdLm Pf cnfo~menStueh u Kareh u~d #iturc,dmcd ~timplcmentllrthC teeuletjons, moat be turkd ou whb cfro~pdfoa talriq Into cwddcntlon the atahu oi the COIUiihltid E~t~CP8C kdDTC the PML UoPn ~ ~uEjl C: I i I; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111