13- ~AAgErRESEARCH: _STREHGTHS The Wills Harket Research function is relatively unique in B~I~T, Group experience with regard to its low agency dependence and correspondingly MC in-house analytic capability, supported by what is generally regarded as a state-of-the-art hardware/softuare combination (HicroVax and The Research hchine)l This analytic capability, coupled with the facts of dramatic escalation in market research agency costs in the last decade, places Wills in a highly favourable position regarding the timelcost effectiveness of market research activity, The PU~UtY of the research undertaken reaches particularly high standards far two reasons: i, the ratio of professional staff and the standards of professfonalirnn are high, in·house management of the majc~ity of research means higher revels of quality control, in addition, Wilt ~arkst Research has established a clear lead tin context of the B,G,r, Group) in the design and use of simulated test market methodolog (f, e, Assessor), MAR~ET AESEBA~H: WEAP;NESSES The relationship of in-house panel testing to consumer product testing is confused by; a) differing functional reporting responsibilities, b) vocabulary and attribute meaning redundancy, irrdwancy and mismatch, and e) methodological and analytical anomalies. Is a result, the quality of marketing setting of the product brief is poor, and competitor comparison is insufficiently attended to, Notably, product brief setting lacks the use of specified product Ic attributes which are;.a) represented in both in·hause panel test V~ vcca~ulary and consumer product test vocatulary, and b) capable of understanding and operationalising by product developers, ~ Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111 me use of market segentation strategies and in-depth qualitative techrlques is under developed, particularly in terms of wing these techniques PrPlectirelr i,e, to identif) marketlproduct opportunities, The current limitations on i~house consumer product testing (notably external door access to Southern Research offices) represent a severe limitation on what the department sash to achieve in the area of product . testing and development or new projective techniques, Other more timelcost effective routes to consumer contact should also be considered (particularly the postal placement), however, the inlhouse consumer studies unit should not be underestimated as the prime route for research method development and timelcost effective product testing, RESFARCLL. OPPORTUNITIES Given that the market is becoming relatively homogeneous by brand, while choice behaviour is increasingly characterised by a complex tradeofi or perceived valuelpricelprestige and smoking quality by consumer type; conjoint choicelpreference models would appear to be mast appropriate in this market, Coupling a conjoint preference model to a consumer se~entatibn scheme based on product benefit require~ent could be a fruitful approach, Definition of a core product attribute vocabulary set, and its incorporation into in-house panel testing~nd consumer product test vehicles would have the effect of assisting quality of interpretation from these alterative information sources, Developing this core vocabulary into a competitive mapping approach, to be undertaken on a routine basis in both blind and branded form, would have the following advantages: heightened axareness of competitive positioning in the marketplace, ii) sep~entation~ of consumers by brand choice, product perception and E~ imagery responsiveness, iii) the opportunity to use such background knowledge to inform strategic thinking behind brand briefs, and the vocabulary of Cn Product briefs, Clit; PDF -!::!!::!!::!.f3 StlC.i: 0111