WESTMINSTER HOUSE 7 MILLBANK LONDON SWIF WE 01-222 1222 C. I.&L I U N 1977 SECRET 1-71 RH/JC. 13th June, 1977. Coov for C.H. Stewar: Loc-1-har:. IS-n. Recently BAT was present at a meeting here in the UK, convened by Imperial Tobacco, and which was also attended by other major international tobacco companies. This Group will in future be known as "The International Committee on Smoking Issues ". During the meeting the enclosed paper was discussed and all companies present agreed that it sum marised the Industry Is "philosophy" on a number of issues. It is BAT's view that companies should table this paper within their own associations, with a view to its adoption as a working paper from which strategies and action plans can be developed relevant to local situations. The meeting also agreed to the setting up of three Working Parties to consider and recommend 1xidustry action on the following areas:- (i) Smoking Behaviour (chaired by BAT) 00 Medical Research (chaired by Imperial) (iii) The Social Acceptability of Smoking (chaired by R.J. Reynolds). Die Wcrking Parties' recommendations are to be submitted BATCo document for Province of BritiSh Columbia 1 November 1999 - 2 - to the member companies by September 17th next and will be considered by the Group at their next meeting in Lausanne in November. With kind regards, Yours sincerely, Jv (R.HADDON) Enclosure: BATCo document for Province of British Columbia I November 1999 SECRET POSMON PAPER I. Medical Controversy We acknowledge the fact that there is a continuing smoking and health controversy but we do not accept as proven that there is a causal relationship between smoking and various diseases (such as lung cancer, heart diseases, bronchitis, etc). The claimed relationship is primarily based on epidemiological or statistical associations. These statistical or epidemiclogical associations alone cannot establish a cause and effect relationship between smoking and disease. Allso it has become easier for some to indict smoking as the primary source of today's medical problems than to confront the data which suggest other explanations. In our view the issue of causation remains controversial and unresolved. We adNocate the need for further research into the causes of those diseases with which smoking has been associated and into the nature of any relationship between smoking and such diseases. To be effective, it is desirable that the tobacco industry as a whole must be seen to be responsible and, within our field, authoritative. Moreover, we believe it is better to speak as an industry with one voice on such matters and that this can often best be accomplished through national associations of manufacturers. In this connection, we believe it important that the industry assures that all appropriate members are kept advised of pertinent scientific, political, social and other developments. 2. Social Awareness, Responsibility and the Social: Acceptability of Smokinq Because there is general sensitivity in respect of our products per se, we should at all times be particularly vigilant in ensuring that we remain beyond reproach concerning the ordinary duties and obligations we owe both our consumers and our workers. Whilst the opponents of smoking use emotional arguments rather than scientific facts in their attempts to make smoking socially,-- unacceptable, we must ensure that we never knowingly mislead our consumers ,rho must believe that as manufacturers at all BATCO document for Province of British COIUMbia I November 1999 2 times we are acting responsibly and have concern for their interests. We should state quite properly and responsibly thatview of the smoking and health controversy that recognises that the causation issue remains controversial and u-iresolved. We take the view that to date there is no persuasive scientific evidence to support the contention that the non-smoker is harmed by the tobacco smoke of others. However, it is our position that both smokers and non-smokers should be considerate of each other. 3. Disclosure of Information We should influence as far as proper medical and official opinion against incautious imposition of constraints and any unnecessar"! restrictions on smoking. To do this it may be necessary to tall: to medical authorities and Government agenCLes. Our legitimate objectives must include protection of the interests of our consumers. Where the Industry is spcnsoring health research it should, as appropriate, keep others, including members of the industr-y in other countries, informed. An Industry in one country might, when appropriate, make known the research in other countries. 4. The Role of Government in a Free Societv The Industry believes that smokers are well aware of the claimed health effects of smoking. Information is available to the public from a variety of sources. The traditional role of Government in a free society with reference to legal products is to inform people, to give them the facts or to see that they are given the facts, and to leave the exercise of free choice to the individual. 5. Warninq Clauses If Governments propose wording implying or stating smoking causes certain diseases, Companies must strenuously resist with all means at their disposal. BATCo document for Province of BritiSh Columbia 1 November 1999 3 6. Leaque Tables So far there is no valid scientific basis for combining measure- ments of different chemical compounds in the smoke of an individual cigarette brand into a single index number as to represent a measure of implied hazard relative to other brands Such aggregation implies unjustifiable judgments of the strength of association between chemical compounds and diseases. Such arbitrary indices of hazard cannot receive any serious scientific support and their introduction should be resisted wherever poss- ible. 7. Maximum "Tar" and Nicotine Limits The imposition of maximum "tar" and nicotine yields, as well as attempts by Governments to tax high "tar" products different- ially to those with lower deliveries, should be resisted. 8. Advertisina It is the Industry view that there is no valid evidence to support the contention that advertising increases total consumption of cigarettes. - Advertising may affect the sales distribution among individual companies or specific brands. In attempting to obtain the best possible shares of the market cigarette manufacturers have used competitive advertising to inform the consumer of product availability, modifications and innovations. In view of the existence of the medical controversy, in any advert- ising, claims, -express or implied, that one cigarette is healthier or less harmful than another should be avoided. We should resist restrictions on media advertising; however, in the area of voluntary agreements with Governments we should recognise that there is a limit beyond which the Industry cannot make further concessions. 9. Declaration of Constituents %%L- should resist any requirements to put figures for the yields of smoke constituents or "tar" groups on packs or in advertising~_ BATCo document for Province of British Columbia I November 1999 4 10. Research Research plays a key role in our reaction to the attacks on smcking. It is incumbent an a responsible manufacturer to understand the allegations against smoking products, and to acquire on a continuing basis as much knowledge as possible of his croducts . It is our policy to further support work on the scientific smoking and health controversy. The results of such scientific investig- ations must be made available to the public by appropriate means. 11. Product Liabilitv We should keep aware of. examine carefully and take appropriate action when advisable with respect to the laws and proposed chances in the laws concerning product liability. 12. Cicarette Manufacturers' Associations We accept the need of national cigarette manufacturers' assoc- iaticns and give them full support. We lbeUeve that the Industrv's activities in the smoking and healt!"I field should be carried out by or through the Associations, whenever this is appropriate. 10 th Ju-2. BATCo document for Province of British Columbia I November 1999